MMA8452QR1

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

MMA8452QR1

Jump to solution
2,607 Views
abialevich1
Contributor II

Good morning Team,

MMA8452QR1 is this obsolete component? If yes, any alternative options like-for-like available?

Tags (1)
1 Solution
2,577 Views
diazmarin09
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hello abialevich1,

I hope all is great with you. Thank you for using the NXP communities.

You are correct, the MMA8452Q device is obsolete. Unfortunately, we do not have a direct replacement. I mean, pin-to-pin compatible.

In this case, I would like to recommend the following series from our accelerometer portfolio:

FXLS8967AF - ±2g/±4g/±8g/±16g, Low Power 12-bit Digital Accelerometer

I hope this information helps.

Regards,

David

View solution in original post

5 Replies
2,578 Views
diazmarin09
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hello abialevich1,

I hope all is great with you. Thank you for using the NXP communities.

You are correct, the MMA8452Q device is obsolete. Unfortunately, we do not have a direct replacement. I mean, pin-to-pin compatible.

In this case, I would like to recommend the following series from our accelerometer portfolio:

FXLS8967AF - ±2g/±4g/±8g/±16g, Low Power 12-bit Digital Accelerometer

I hope this information helps.

Regards,

David

2,285 Views
jridings1
Contributor IV

Rochester Electronics has partnered with NXP Motion Sensor team to offer EOL products. We have acquired extensive authorized NXP inventory on MMA8452QR1/MMA8453Q1/MMA8451Q1. Please visit www.rocelec.com to view our extensive NXP Accelerometer inventory. 

0 Kudos
Reply
2,423 Views
abialevich1
Contributor II

Do you have something available that meets or exceeds the "sensitivity change versus temperature" and "zero-g level change versus temperature" of the MMA8452QR1?

Tags (1)
2,272 Views
onyourlight
Contributor III

MMA8452QR1 has sufficient stock, it is not recommended that you replace it, 1$

0 Kudos
Reply
2,265 Views
jridings1
Contributor IV

2.4Mu at www.rocelec.com

 

0 Kudos
Reply