HABv4.1 vs. TPM1.2

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 
2,967件の閲覧回数
TMain
Contributor III

I was wondering how the HABv4.1 function of the Security Engine in the iMX6 compares to the TPM1.2 (Trusted Platform Module) standard. Does implementing the HAB functionality of the iMX6 meet the TPM1.2 standard?

0 件の賞賛
返信
1 解決策
2,119件の閲覧回数
CommunityBot
Community Manager
This an automatic process.

We are marking this post as solved, due to the either low activity or any reply marked as correct.

If you have additional questions, please create a new post and reference to this closed post.

NXP Community!

元の投稿で解決策を見る

0 件の賞賛
返信
2 返答(返信)
2,120件の閲覧回数
CommunityBot
Community Manager
This an automatic process.

We are marking this post as solved, due to the either low activity or any reply marked as correct.

If you have additional questions, please create a new post and reference to this closed post.

NXP Community!
0 件の賞賛
返信
2,120件の閲覧回数
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

  Strictly speaking, the HAB technology is not intended to meet the TPM1.2.

High Assurance Boot (HAB) is just Freescale’s implementation for secure boot. 


Have a great day,
Yuri.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 件の賞賛
返信