HABv4.1 vs. TPM1.2

取消
显示结果 
显示  仅  | 搜索替代 
您的意思是: 
已解决

HABv4.1 vs. TPM1.2

跳至解决方案
3,405 次查看
TMain
Contributor III

I was wondering how the HABv4.1 function of the Security Engine in the iMX6 compares to the TPM1.2 (Trusted Platform Module) standard. Does implementing the HAB functionality of the iMX6 meet the TPM1.2 standard?

0 项奖励
回复
1 解答
2,557 次查看
CommunityBot
Community Manager
This an automatic process.

We are marking this post as solved, due to the either low activity or any reply marked as correct.

If you have additional questions, please create a new post and reference to this closed post.

NXP Community!

在原帖中查看解决方案

0 项奖励
回复
2 回复数
2,558 次查看
CommunityBot
Community Manager
This an automatic process.

We are marking this post as solved, due to the either low activity or any reply marked as correct.

If you have additional questions, please create a new post and reference to this closed post.

NXP Community!
0 项奖励
回复
2,558 次查看
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

  Strictly speaking, the HAB technology is not intended to meet the TPM1.2.

High Assurance Boot (HAB) is just Freescale’s implementation for secure boot. 


Have a great day,
Yuri.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 项奖励
回复