No, You could not close this thread. lots of things have to get answers.
You have no knowledge of emmc and NXP sent you here as NXP TechSupport to handle this emmc question. It is problem of you or problem of NXP?
The scripts are not irreversible, I tried those scripts. those do not work.
Before I tried those scripts. I am very sure those scripts do not work.
It is proven, not right.
And Aslo monitoring the emmc session, no any cmds issued from host to device for PERM_WRITE_PROTECT.
That is why I asked you to try. and show me the log.
You don't need the emmc knowledge.
You just think about this logical fact, which I asked you to answer. Till now, you still haven't answered.
Again, You don't need the emmc knowledge. You just think about this logical fact.
If the scripts work, and irreversible.
If we have the same files, the same size, the same file name, everything is exactly the same.
It will trigger a risk, the emmc cannot write any more, in your script, no way to turn it writable.
That is logical reason why, I am very sure those scripts do not work after I read them. And to be careful. I tried them.
again,
If the scripts work, and irreversible.
If we have the same files, the same size, the same file name, everything is exactly the same.
It will trigger a risk, the emmc cannot write any more, in your script, no way to turn it writable.
How to resolve this problem. I do not believe Macronix as emmc vendor uses such tricky, I should say stupid, way, which contains a very very big risk.
How do you think Macronix use this stupid way can work? We need to like files in the emmc file system. The scripts dd files.
If this solution works, it is stupid way and a joke.
Let's "assume" the scripts work. How to protect a fat partition as I use mmc jave shown you in your scripts way? How to modify those dd scripts?
I could not image the vendor Macronix do not know the emmc spec.
Do not try to take us as a fool, I know emmc spec very well, which makes me also know about mmc very well.
And you don't need to copy/repeat my mmc method as your answer, which is new for you that leant from me. Acuatly, your copy of my answer, let me find you don't understand the mmc utils and emmc spec.
And You do not understand my answer using mmc.
You have no knowledge of emmc and NXP sent you here as NXP TechSupport to handle this emmc question.
