XS2410 - Current and Voltage Accuracy Clarification

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

XS2410 - Current and Voltage Accuracy Clarification

ソリューションへジャンプ
1,471件の閲覧回数
adamrosy
Contributor I

I have a question regarding the stated current and voltage measurement accuracy for the XS2410.

Am I correct in understanding that the measurement accuracy increases with increasing current? Reading the graph, an output current of 50mA, I would expect the measurement to be within 30% of actual, and at 1A the accuracy would be within ~8% of actual?

adamrosy_0-1747217547786.png

I cannot find any information about the range values for the stated "low" and "high" current ranges so that would also be useful to know if the accuracy changes in either of these ranges, or if the graph can be used to determine the accuracy.

Thank you!

ラベル(1)
タグ(1)
0 件の賞賛
返信
1 解決策
1,459件の閲覧回数
TomasVaverka
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hello Adam,

Yes, the current measurement accuracy does improve with increasing load current. At very low currents (e.g. 5mA), the error is high, so those measurements are useful mainly for detecting presence or absence (e.g. open load), not for precision. At mid-range current (e.g. 200mA), the error drops significantly, but is still not ideal for precise monitoring. Once you reach 1A or more, the current measurement is much more reliable and within ±6%.

Snímek obrazovky 2025-05-14 142816.png

BRs, Tomas

元の投稿で解決策を見る

2 返答(返信)
1,440件の閲覧回数
adamrosy
Contributor I

Hi Tomas,

Brilliant, thank you confirming that!

Best regards,
Adam

0 件の賞賛
返信
1,460件の閲覧回数
TomasVaverka
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hello Adam,

Yes, the current measurement accuracy does improve with increasing load current. At very low currents (e.g. 5mA), the error is high, so those measurements are useful mainly for detecting presence or absence (e.g. open load), not for precision. At mid-range current (e.g. 200mA), the error drops significantly, but is still not ideal for precise monitoring. Once you reach 1A or more, the current measurement is much more reliable and within ±6%.

Snímek obrazovky 2025-05-14 142816.png

BRs, Tomas