NXP CAN Replace the problem

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

NXP CAN Replace the problem

ソリューションへジャンプ
1,432件の閲覧回数
TeemoLi
Contributor III

Please see the below pictures for TJA1042T and TJA1042CT.

The old part number TJA1042T is not recommend for new design.

The TJA1042CT can P2P Replace the TJA1042T. But the Data rata[max ]kbps is different.

TJA1042T :  5000 Kbps         

TJA1042CT :  5 kbps.

please comfirm the  data rate is  TJA1042CT :  5 kbps or  5000kbps?

Why TJA1042CT  is cheaper than TJA1042T . 

TJA1042CT.pngTJA1042T.png

0 件の賞賛
返信
1 解決策
1,421件の閲覧回数
TomasVaverka
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi Yufeng,

Both the TJA1042BT and TJA1042CT are based on our latest SOI3+ process. Below you can see the improvements and benefits of this process. They also have a shorter propagation delay supporting larger network topologies.

The TJA1042T and TJA1042CT have the SPLIT pin (#5) for stabilizing the recessive bus level.
The TJA1042T(K)/3 and TJA1042BT(K) have the VIO pin (#5) for interfacing with 3.3V MCUs.

All these information can be found in the datasheet.

 

The max. data rate of 5 kbps is a typo, the correct one is of course 5 Mbit/s.

 

Capture.JPG

BR, Tomas

 

元の投稿で解決策を見る

0 件の賞賛
返信
1 返信
1,422件の閲覧回数
TomasVaverka
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi Yufeng,

Both the TJA1042BT and TJA1042CT are based on our latest SOI3+ process. Below you can see the improvements and benefits of this process. They also have a shorter propagation delay supporting larger network topologies.

The TJA1042T and TJA1042CT have the SPLIT pin (#5) for stabilizing the recessive bus level.
The TJA1042T(K)/3 and TJA1042BT(K) have the VIO pin (#5) for interfacing with 3.3V MCUs.

All these information can be found in the datasheet.

 

The max. data rate of 5 kbps is a typo, the correct one is of course 5 Mbit/s.

 

Capture.JPG

BR, Tomas

 

0 件の賞賛
返信