CLRC663 layout on a multilayer stack

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

CLRC663 layout on a multilayer stack

492 Views
dramos
Contributor I

Hi to all,

I am designing a 6 layer pcb with the #CLRC663. After reading the Application Note AN11019 (rev 1.5), in the chapter 3.2 Layout recommendation there is a mention about the GND plane under the CLRC663 evaluation board. The GND plane is in middle layer of the board

On the SW4301 - CLEV6630B v2.0 PCB,there is not copper under the matching circuitry. 

As I mentioned before, I have a multilayer board and I would like to know if I can place a GND plane under the matching components (Matching components Layer1-GND Layer2). Can I have traces under the matching components in the other layers? For example layer 3 or Layer 6? 

Or should I remove all the copper under the matching components in all layers of my stack?

Thanks for your comments.

david

 

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
Reply
2 Replies

485 Views
Tomas_Parizek
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello @dramos 

We typically keep a first GND layer under matching as shown below. This is mainly due to EMI reasons. 

matching_GND.jpg

BR

Tomas 

0 Kudos
Reply

475 Views
dramos
Contributor I

Hi Tomas,

Firstly thanks for your response. 

If below the matching circuit I place a GND plane for EMI control , is it necessary to remove the copper area in the rest of the layers? 

In my case I am using a 6 layers stack, if the matching is in the first layer and the GND in the second I think that I shouldn't remove the copper on the other four layers. The demo board is not made in that way and I cannot understand why.

Any idea about the best procedure?

Thanks to all 

david

0 Kudos
Reply
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2134664%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3ECLRC663%20layout%20on%20a%20multilayer%20stack%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2134664%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20to%20all%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20designing%20a%206%20layer%20pcb%20with%20the%20%23CLRC663.%20After%20reading%20the%20Application%20Note%20AN11019%20(rev%201.5)%2C%20in%20the%20chapter%203.2%20Layout%20recommendation%20there%20is%20a%20mention%20about%20the%20GND%20plane%20under%20the%26nbsp%3BCLRC663%20evaluation%20board.%20The%20GND%20plane%20is%20in%20middle%20layer%20of%20the%20board%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOn%20the%20SW4301%20-%20CLEV6630B%20v2.0%20PCB%2Cthere%20is%20not%20copper%20under%20the%20matching%20circuitry.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAs%20I%20mentioned%20before%2C%20I%20have%20a%20multilayer%20board%20and%20I%20would%20like%20to%20know%20if%20I%20can%20place%20a%20GND%20plane%20under%20the%20matching%20components%20(Matching%20components%20Layer1-GND%20Layer2).%20Can%20I%20have%20traces%20under%20the%20matching%20components%20in%20the%20other%20layers%3F%20For%20example%20layer%203%20or%20Layer%206%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOr%20should%20I%20remove%20all%20the%20copper%20under%20the%20matching%20components%20in%20all%20layers%20of%20my%20stack%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20for%20your%20comments.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Edavid%3C%2FP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-2134664%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EContact%20Smart%20Card%20Reader%20ICs%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2134896%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%20translate%3D%22no%22%3ERe%3A%20CLRC663%20layout%20on%20a%20multilayer%20stack%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2134896%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Tomas%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EFirstly%20thanks%20for%20your%20response.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIf%20below%20the%20matching%20circuit%20I%20place%20a%20GND%20plane%20for%20EMI%20control%20%2C%20is%20it%20necessary%20to%20remove%20the%20copper%20area%20in%20the%20rest%20of%20the%20layers%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIn%20my%20case%20I%20am%20using%20a%206%20layers%20stack%2C%20if%20the%20matching%20is%20in%20the%20first%20layer%20and%20the%20GND%20in%20the%20second%20I%20think%20that%20I%20shouldn't%20remove%20the%20copper%20on%20the%20other%20four%20layers.%20The%20demo%20board%20is%20not%20made%20in%20that%20way%20and%20I%20cannot%20understand%20why.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAny%20idea%20about%20the%20best%20procedure%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20to%20all%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Edavid%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2134672%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%20translate%3D%22no%22%3ERe%3A%20CLRC663%20layout%20on%20a%20multilayer%20stack%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2134672%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EHello%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.nxp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F252738%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40dramos%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EWe%20typically%20keep%20a%20first%20GND%20layer%20under%20matching%20as%20shown%20below.%20This%20is%20mainly%20due%20to%20EMI%20reasons.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22matching_GND.jpg%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22matching_GND.jpg%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.nxp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F347776i50D5E4F87055BF63%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22matching_GND.jpg%22%20alt%3D%22matching_GND.jpg%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EBR%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ETomas%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E