ls1046a: qman failure

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

ls1046a: qman failure

2,761 Views
renaud
Contributor IV

We have a LS1046A based board with the following failure:

 

[    0.220387] fsl_dpaa_mac 1ae6000.ethernet: qman_init_fq(1951) = -5
[    0.302707] fsl_dpa dpaa-ethernet.0: qman_retire_fq(1951) = -22
[    0.373551] fsl_dpa dpaa-ethernet.0: qman_oos_fq(1951) = -22

 

Any idea what could be triggering this error during Linux boot (5.17). Can this be triggered by an hardware issue?

0 Kudos
Reply
6 Replies

2,653 Views
renaud
Contributor IV

REturn result from MCR:

[ 0.213821] result = 0xf2
[ 0.245090] fsl_dpaa_mac 1ae6000.ethernet: qman_init_fq(1633) = -5
[ 0.326008] fsl_dpa dpaa-ethernet.0: qman_retire_fq(1633) = -22
[ 0.396850] fsl_dpa dpaa-ethernet.0: qman_oos_fq(1633) = -22

0 Kudos
Reply

2,705 Views
LFGP
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

could you please try with the NXP LLDP 6.1.36 it uses the LTS Kernel 6.1.

 

0 Kudos
Reply

2,693 Views
renaud
Contributor IV

Can you point me to the documentation to load the and build the distro?

0 Kudos
Reply

2,675 Views
LFGP
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport
You will need to use the LLDP user guide, please follow to the next link to download the PDF file.
https://www.nxp.com/design/design-center/software/embedded-software/linux-software-and-development-t...
be sure to click in the PDF instead HTLM
0 Kudos
Reply

2,741 Views
LFGP
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

from my point view, the issue is not due to hardware.

It looks like you are trying to create a DPAA object before the DPAA drives be initialized.

 

0 Kudos
Reply

2,720 Views
renaud
Contributor IV

So we found that it happens on only on one for our boards. It does not happen after running a memory test from the boot loader, the difference being the pattern left in DDR memory - 0 with memory test, deadbeef when not run. 

We have not seen it happen on Linux 6.4.

Looking at the Linux log to see if there was anything that may have fixed the problem

 

 

0 Kudos
Reply