LA1224-RDB-BHS schematic

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LA1224-RDB-BHS schematic

Jump to solution
1,810 Views
NigelP
Contributor II

Hi,

We have a LA1224-RDB-BHS development board and are trying to use various interfaces on it but are occasionally hitting problems. Can you provide a full schematic?

The user manual (UM12137) does not provide enough detail.

Thanks

Nigel

0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
1,691 Views
yipingwang
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

I have shared the schematics  to you through email.

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
Reply
9 Replies
1,664 Views
NigelP
Contributor II

Hi,

The schematic is certainly useful. But any reason why the schematic is called LA1224-RDB-BHS_Glasgow_54991_A1.pdf and yet the LA processor used in the schematic is an LA1235 and not an LA1224?

Thanks

Nigel

0 Kudos
Reply
1,663 Views
NigelP
Contributor II

Reading the info from the processor it does look like we have an LA1235 on it, just a bit confusing.

0 Kudos
Reply
1,776 Views
yipingwang
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Can you please mention the schematics number?

0 Kudos
Reply
1,757 Views
NigelP
Contributor II

Hi,

Sorry I've no idea what the schematic number is. Neither the User Manual (UM12137) or the User Guide (UG10144) make any reference to a schematic that I can find.

Thanks

Nigel

0 Kudos
Reply
1,739 Views
NigelP
Contributor II

Hi,

Having taken the case off now, there are a couple of numbers on the board itself, they are 'SCH-54991 REV A' and below that '700-54991 REV X4'.

Thanks

Nigel

0 Kudos
Reply
1,730 Views
yipingwang
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

The AE team has provide schematics LA1224-RDB-BHS_Glasgow_54991_A1.

 

Did you sign NDA with NXP?

Would you please provide your NDA number?

 

0 Kudos
Reply
1,717 Views
NigelP
Contributor II

Hi,

I think the NDA number is NDA# TTP-100238.

Thanks

Nigel

0 Kudos
Reply
1,692 Views
yipingwang
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

I have shared the schematics  to you through email.

0 Kudos
Reply
1,685 Views
NigelP
Contributor II

Thanks

0 Kudos
Reply