Question, i.MX6SoloLite uSDHC

取消
显示结果 
显示  仅  | 搜索替代 
您的意思是: 

Question, i.MX6SoloLite uSDHC

1,317 次查看
Aemj
Contributor IV

Dear team,

I would like to ask about uSDHC of i.MX6SoloLite.

[Q1]

The following statements are written in your i.MX6SL reference manual(IMX6SLRM, Rev.2) at the description of SDCLKFS.

"If setting SDCLKFS and DVS can generate same clock frequency,(For example, in SDR mode, SDCLKFS = 01h is same as DVS = 01h.) SDCLKFS is highly recommended. "

My customer’s understanding for your recommendation is to use only SDCLKFS than to use both of SDCLKFS and DVS.

Could you show me the actual difference between using only SDCLKFS and using both?

Can I understand the value of SDCLKFS should be larger among some combinations of SDCLKFS and DVS values?

[Q2]

After looking at the following thread of i.MX community;

https://community.nxp.com/message/555761

My customer thinks that DLL Enable will be automatically adjusted in the case of DLL_CTRL_SLV_OVERRIDE="0" & DLL_CTRL_ENABLE="1".

Is it true?

Thanks,

Miyamoto

标签 (1)
0 项奖励
回复
1 回复

1,182 次查看
art
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Q. My customer’s understanding for your recommendation is to use only SDCLKFS than to use both of SDCLKFS and DVS.

A. Yes, this is correct.

Q. Could you show me the actual difference between using only SDCLKFS and using both?

A. It is not recommended to use the DVS divider since some (especially odd) settings of this divider can result in non-50% duty cycle card clock.

Q. My customer thinks that DLL Enable will be automatically adjusted in the case of DLL_CTRL_SLV_OVERRIDE="0" & DLL_CTRL_ENABLE="1". Is it true?

A. Yes, this is correct.


Have a great day,
Artur

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 项奖励
回复