FAQs
English (US) 日本語 | Japanese 中文 | Chinese (Simplified)

SE050 Working

cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SE050 Working

4 weeks ago
1,594 Views
Changhawn
Contributor IV

Dear

With SE050 Evb,  TLS 1.3 Handshaking is tested. And I have some question about SE050 working.

1. Memory-related issues
When executing the key writing API (Se05x_API_WriteECKey_Ver()) during the TLS handshake, it returns 0x6a84.
SM_ERR_FILE_FULL = 0x6A84, // Not enough memory space available (either transient or persistent memory)

The same issue persists even after powering off and on again.

What are the causes and solutions for this memory space issue?

 

2. When trying to check free memory with Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory() to confirm issue #1 above,

SE050 returns incorrect data (0x6a80), as shown below. Can I use this API? Please help.

[ERR][cli] Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory Failed(0x6a80)
[INF][cli] Persistent Memory 0x0000
[ERR][cli] Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory Failed(0x6a80)
[INF][cli] Transient Memory 0x0000

 

3. When SE050 doesn't work (no SE050 I2C response), even after a main board power reset, it still doesn't work.

Sometimes, after several attempts, it starts working again for no reason.

Are there any specific booting or working conditions required for SE050 to function properly?

 

Thank in advance.

0 Kudos
Reply
11 Replies

4 weeks ago
1,576 Views
Kan_Li
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi @Changhawn ,

 

Is it possible to provide more details regarding the platform as well as the SE050 board? are you using OM-SE050ARD-E? Is your plarform a MCU based platform? Which variant of SE050 is used in your test? Please kindly clarify.

 

Have a great day,
Kan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos
Reply

4 weeks ago
1,571 Views
Changhawn
Contributor IV

Dear Kan_Li

Yes. Platform is like this(S32K314(FreeRTOS+LWIP+MbedTLS+HSE) + SE050),  and use OM-SE050ARD-E. 

With MCU based platform, I do testing TLS1.3. (Handshake is sometimes ok. )

SE050 : ECC, ECDH, ECDSA, HKDF & Key mgmt

S32K314 HSE  : AES, CMAC, HMAC, AES GCM(AEAD) & Key mgmt

about Issues, 

1. memory related issue :   issue is happened in Key generation.(ECDHE)

2. Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory() : for debugging about issue number 1.

3. Sometimes, after MCU Reset, SE050 is returned as failed(I2C Arbitration lost)

Thank you.

Chang.

 

0 Kudos
Reply

4 weeks ago
1,562 Views
Kan_Li
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi @Changhawn ，

 

Thanks for the info! Can the getinfo demo work with this part on your platform? It looks like platformSCP03 was set mandatory while the controller still communicated with the SE in plain channel.

 

Have a great day,
Kan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos
Reply

4 weeks ago
1,538 Views
Changhawn
Contributor IV

Dear Kan_Li.

For debugging, more information.

When I use Se05x_API_DeleteAll_Iterative() for deleting all object, error is returned in Se05x_API_ReadIDList() like below.

 

ReadIDList Failed=0x6985

// SM_ERR_CONDITIONS_OF_USE_NOT_SATISFIED = 0x6985,

 

smStatus_t Se05x_API_DeleteAll_Iterative(pSe05xSession_t session_ctx)
{
    uint8_t pmore = kSE05x_MoreIndicator_NA;
    uint8_t list[1024];
    size_t listlen = sizeof(list);
    size_t i;
    smStatus_t retStatus  = SM_NOT_OK;
    uint16_t outputOffset = 0;

    do {
        retStatus = Se05x_API_ReadIDList(session_ctx, outputOffset, 0xFF, &pmore, list, &listlen);
        if (retStatus != SM_OK) {
            SMLOG_I("ReadIDList Failed=0x%04x", retStatus);
            goto exit;
        }
        outputOffset = (uint16_t)listlen;
        for (i = 0; i < listlen; i += 4) {
            uint32_t id = 0 | (list[i + 0] << (3 * 8)) | (list[i + 1] << (2 * 8)) | (list[i + 2] << (1 * 8)) |
                          (list[i + 3] << (0 * 8));
            if (SE05X_OBJID_SE05X_APPLET_RES_START == SE05X_OBJID_SE05X_APPLET_RES_MASK(id)) {
                SMLOG_I("Not erasing ObjId=0x%08X (Reserved)", id);
                /* In Reserved space */
            }
            else if (EX_SSS_OBJID_DEMO_AUTH_START == EX_SSS_OBJID_DEMO_AUTH_MASK(id)) {
                SMLOG_I("Not erasing ObjId=0x%08X (Demo Auth)", id);
                /* Not reasing default authentication object */
            }
            else if (EX_SSS_OBJID_IOT_HUB_A_START == EX_SSS_OBJID_IOT_HUB_A_MASK(id)) {
                SMLOG_I("Not erasing ObjId=0x%08X (IoT Hub)", id);
                /* Not reasing IoT Hub object */
            }
            else if (!SE05X_OBJID_TP_MASK(id) && id) {
                SMLOG_I("Not erasing Trust Provisioned objects");
            }
            else {
                retStatus = Se05x_API_DeleteSecureObject(session_ctx, id);
                if (retStatus != SM_OK) {
                    SMLOG_I("Error in erasing ObjId=0x%08X (Others)", id);
                }
            }
        }
    } while (pmore == kSE05x_MoreIndicator_MORE);

exit:
    return retStatus;
}
0 Kudos
Reply

4 weeks ago
1,558 Views
Changhawn
Contributor IV

Dear Kan_Li.

Thank you for your guide.

Getinfo demo(GetVersion) work well in our platform.

scp03 key and auth key was set like below API(GetInfo).

Is it(plain channel or secure channel) related to Issue 1, 2 ?

Thank you. 

Chang.

int ex_se05x_GetInfo()
{
    smStatus_t status             = SM_NOT_OK;
    pSe05xSession_t p_session_ctx = &se05x_session;
    int ret                       = 1;
    uint32_t mem = 0;

    ex_set_scp03_keys(p_session_ctx);
    ex_set_ec_auth_keys(p_session_ctx);

    p_session_ctx = se05x_get_session();
    if (p_session_ctx == NULL) {
        SMLOG_E("Error in Se05x_API_SessionOpen \r\n");

        return 1;
    }

        /* Get applet version and config details */
        ret = Iot_Applet_Identify(p_session_ctx, 1);
        if (ret != 0) {
            SMLOG_I("Error in Iot_Applet_Identify \n");
        }

    //   #define SE05X_VERSION_HEX_07_02
    p_session_ctx->applet_version = 0x07020000;
    status = Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory(p_session_ctx, kSE05x_MemoryType_PERSISTENT, &mem);
    if (status != SM_OK) {
        SMLOG_E("Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory Failed(0x%x)", status);
        status = kStatus_SSS_Fail;
    }
    if ((mem >= 0x7FFF) && (p_session_ctx->applet_version <= SE05X_VERSION_HEX_07_02)) {
        SMLOG_I("If 32768 bytes or more bytes are available, 32767 bytes free is reported.");
    }

    SMLOG_I("Persistent Memory 0x%04x", mem);

    status = Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory(p_session_ctx, kSE05x_MemoryType_TRANSIENT_RESET, &mem);
    if (status != SM_OK) {
        SMLOG_E("Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory Failed(0x%x)", status);
        status = kStatus_SSS_Fail;
    }
    if ((mem >= 0x7FFF) && (p_session_ctx->applet_version <= SE05X_VERSION_HEX_07_02)) {
        SMLOG_I("If 32768 bytes or more bytes are available, 32767 bytes free is reported.");
    }

    SMLOG_I("Transient Memory 0x%04x", mem);

    status = Se05x_API_SessionClose(p_session_ctx);
    if (status != SM_OK) {
        SMLOG_I("Error in Se05x_API_SessionClose \n");
        return 1;
    }

    return 0;
}
0 Kudos
Reply

4 weeks ago
1,563 Views
Changhawn
Contributor IV

Dear Kan_Li.

Issue 3 is cleared. so debugging on Issue 1, 2.

Below log is applet version and config details. 

Thank you.

Chang.

 

< Log >


[INF][cli] Open Session to SE05x

[INF][cli] Plug and Trust nano package - version: 1.5.4

[INF][cli] Applet Major = 7

[INF][cli] Applet Minor = 2

[INF][cli] Applet patch = 0

[INF][cli] AppletConfig = 3F9F

[INF][cli] With ECDSA_ECDH_ECDHE
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] With EDDSA
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] With DH_MONT
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] With HMAC
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] WithOut RSA_PLAIN
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] WithOut RSA_CRT
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] With AES
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] With DES
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] With PBKDF
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] With TLS
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] With MIFARE
[INF][cli]

[INF][cli] With I2CM
[INF][cli]

[ERR][cli] Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory Failed(0x6a80)
[INF][cli] Persistent Memory 0x0000
[ERR][cli] Se05x_API_GetFreeMemory Failed(0x6a80)
[INF][cli] Transient Memory 0x0000

0 Kudos
Reply

4 weeks ago
1,514 Views
Kan_Li
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi @Changhawn ,

 

Thanks for the info! Is it possible to provide the APDU command log as well? Seems you are using the nano package, so you may build the package with SMLOG_DEBUG_MESSAGES definition to enable the debug log info.

 

Have a great day,
Kan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos
Reply

4 weeks ago
1,510 Views
Changhawn
Contributor IV

Dear Kan_Li.

Yes , used some API of Nano version. also used Full version.

I have no SMLOG_DEBUG_MESSAGES definition. 

I can not enable any log feature, I2C has problem by log message.

If you need apdu of som API, please tell me the API. I can give you APDU of that API.

Thank you.

Chang.

0 Kudos
Reply

4 weeks ago
1,504 Views
Kan_Li
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi @Changhawn ,

 

Looks like the secure objects created in your SE consumed all the memory, so that you had such issue with readidlist, which needs extend APDU format to have a longer size for receiving the secure object list , Please kindly refer to https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/SE050E-question-for-Se05x-API-GetFreeMemory-and-e... for more details regarding how to enable the extend APDU format in the nano package.

 

Hope that helps,

 

Have a great day,
Kan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos
Reply

3 weeks ago
1,462 Views
Changhawn
Contributor IV

Dear Kan_Li.

Thank you for your support.

One more question about my issue.

With "WITH_PLATFORM_SCP03" and correct enc_key and mac_key,

I can confirm the memory status and deleting object.

Is it(below log 2) normal? ,

But when run the TLS 1.3 Handshake(writing key) , "SM_ERR_SECURITY_STATUS" is returned like log 1.  Could you give what's problem?

Thank you 

Chang.

 

< log 1 >

[INF][devtask] ECDH compute shared secret with SE050
[SE_APDU] Se05x_API_GetECCurveId is ok keyid(0xef0000ec) retObjectType(49) curveid(5) transientType(2)
[SE_APDU] sss_se05x_key_store_set_ecc_public_key KeyId(0xef000371) keybitlen(521), keyLen(133) ciphertype(40)
[SE_APDU] sss_se05x_key_store_set_ecc_public_key curve_id 5, key_part 32
[SE_APDU] WriteECKey_Ver Failed(0x6982)


SM_ERR_SECURITY_STATUS = 0x6982, // Security status not satisfied

 

< log 2 >

/* Memory status of SE050 */
show mem...
[INF][cli] Open Session to SE05x

[INF][cli] Plug and Trust nano package - version: 1.5.4

[INF][cli] Establish Secure Channel to SE05x !

[INF][cli] Created scp03 Session

[INF][cli] If 32768 bytes or more bytes are available, 32767 bytes free is reported.
[INF][cli] Persistent Memory 0x7fff
[INF][cli] Transient Memory 0x02bc


/* Run the Se05x_API_DeleteAll_Iterative API */
Delete Object...
[INF][cli] Open Session to SE05x

[INF][cli] Plug and Trust nano package - version: 1.5.4

[INF][cli] Establish Secure Channel to SE05x !

[INF][cli] Created scp03 Session

[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000103 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000101 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000102 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000100 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000003 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000001 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000002 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000000 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000013 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000012 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0000020 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0xF0003394 (IoT Hub)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0x7FFF020B (Reserved)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0x7FFF0204 (Reserved)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0x7FFF0202 (Reserved)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0x7FFF0201 (Reserved)
[INF][cli] Not erasing ObjId=0x7FFF0206 (Reserved)
SE050 Reset Success !!!
$

0 Kudos
Reply

3 weeks ago
1,431 Views
Kan_Li
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi @Changhawn ,

 

If you have successful result only when "WITH_PLATFORM_SCP03" and correct enc_key and mac_key, it means you have enabled platformSCP03 mandatory. 

 

from log1, I can not comment as no APDU log available, is it possible to open the debug info printing? 

 

Thanks for your patience!

 

Have a great day,
Kan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos
Reply