SM4.SEMA4.SWCHECK?

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 
1,626件の閲覧回数
RandyKrakora
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Customer is Ford. s32g3

 

SM4.SEMA4.SWCHECK: Semaphore Software Check, how this safety mechanism can be implemented?

Is mcal is taking care of semaphore lock verification part?

 

-Randy Krakora

ラベル(1)
0 件の賞賛
1 解決策
1,391件の閲覧回数
RandyKrakora
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Investigation was done via jira ticket and this case can be closed. The Fls driver uses an API that performs the SM4.SEMA4.SWCHECK check which was explained to the customer and also that any low-level SEMA4 API they use, they will need to properly check.

 

[ARTD-151747] SM4.SEMA4.SWCHECK - not integrated into Xrdc Sema42 driver? - NXP JIRA

 

-Randy Krakora

元の投稿で解決策を見る

0 件の賞賛
2 返答(返信)
1,392件の閲覧回数
RandyKrakora
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Investigation was done via jira ticket and this case can be closed. The Fls driver uses an API that performs the SM4.SEMA4.SWCHECK check which was explained to the customer and also that any low-level SEMA4 API they use, they will need to properly check.

 

[ARTD-151747] SM4.SEMA4.SWCHECK - not integrated into Xrdc Sema42 driver? - NXP JIRA

 

-Randy Krakora

0 件の賞賛
1,564件の閲覧回数
antoinedubois
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Randy,

No the MCAL is not implemented this test. If the SEMA4 is used as a safety mechanisms by the customer they should try during their latent fault test at application to lock it and then access it and verify if the error is being received. It is easier to perfom this tet at application level specifically to the usage of the SEMA4.

0 件の賞賛