[S32N55 / HSE2] Debug Card Request — HSE_DEBUG_INVALID_DEBUG_DOMAIN_MAP_ERR

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

[S32N55 / HSE2] Debug Card Request — HSE_DEBUG_INVALID_DEBUG_DOMAIN_MAP_ERR

54 Views
EddiePark
Contributor IV

Hi,

Following up on S32N55 (HSE2) Secure Debug. CRS(APP) challenge-response authentication now works (final response 0x4A4A4A4A). I am now on the debug card request (HSE_DEBUG_CMD_CARD_REQUEST), and it returns:

HSE_DEBUG_INVALID_DEBUG_DOMAIN_MAP_ERR ((hseDebugError_t)0x20) — "invalid debug domain map in debug card."

What I send (per your earlier feedback):

Packet2 Debug Domain Signal List: array style, List[22..26] = 0x01 each (CRS: Cortex-M7, PCIe, CRS NoC/CAN NoC, CANXL0-1, CANXL2-3), all other bytes 0x00.

Packet3 enabledDebugDomainMap (uint64_t): 0x07C00000 as advised (bits 22-26).

AuthScheme: macAlgo = HSE_MAC_ALGO_CMAC = 0x11.

AuthTag: AES256-CMAC over the card info, authLen = 16.

What I have tried for enabledDebugDomainMap (uint64_t, 8 bytes on the wire):

Little-endian: 00 00 C0 07 00 00 00 00 → 0x20
Big-endian: 00 00 00 00 07 C0 00 00 → 0x20
bit27 (0x08000000, matching AUTH target 0x1B) → 0x20
All return the same 0x20.

Questions:

1. For CRS, what is the exact enabledDebugDomainMap (uint64_t) value HSE expects, and in what wire byte order?


2. Must enabledDebugDomainMap (Packet3 bitmask) be consistent with the Debug Domain Signal List (Packet2, array List[22..26])? What is the exact relationship?


3. The RM example states "domain 1,3 enabled → 0x00..A0." Could you clarify the domain-to-bit mapping so I can compute the CRS value?


4. Does HSE validate the domain map before verifying the AuthTag? I want to confirm whether 0x20 indicates only the domain map is wrong, or whether other fields (e.g. the AuthTag / signed data range) could also be causing HSE to stop at this point.


I also want to confirm the signed data range for the card AuthTag: I currently compute AES256-CMAC over the card info fields (authKeyRef + reserved0 + ownerId + authScheme + signal list + domain map + UID list). Is this the correct data to sign?

Best regards,

0 Kudos
Reply
1 Reply

23 Views
chenyin_h
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello, @EddiePark 

Thanks for your post.

1. It is pleased to hear that the phase1 has been passed without issues.2.  For your phase2 queries, I am still checking with it for a more clear description, and would reply you later if there are any valuable updates

To make it aligned, would you mind sharing with me the latest logs and corresponding scripts used again, which could be shared via message as usual.

 

BR

Chenyin  

0 Kudos
Reply