Clarifications required regarding Fail safe oscillator drift Fault(FS_OSC_DRIFT)

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Clarifications required regarding Fail safe oscillator drift Fault(FS_OSC_DRIFT)

Jump to solution
84 Views
Sivahari
Contributor I

Hi Nxp,

I have been using FS2613 SBC chip and I found safety requirement (SM48) which is related to Fail safe oscillator drift Fault (FS_OSC_DRIFT). But ASIL level information is not available in reference manual.

So, kindly clarify that, this fault comes under either ASIL B/ ASIL D/ QM?

Thanks,

Sivahari G

0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
60 Views
RafaR
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello Sivahari

Good day!

The FS_OSC_DRIFT fault (SM48) corresponds to the monitoring of the independent fail-safe oscillator used by the FS26 fail-safe state machine. According to the FS26 Safety Manual, this mechanism is implemented within the ASIL D fail-safe domain.

You can find this representation in Figure 8. Safety architecture.

I hope this information has helped you, please let me know if you need help with anything else.

Have a great day and best of luck.

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
Reply
1 Reply
61 Views
RafaR
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello Sivahari

Good day!

The FS_OSC_DRIFT fault (SM48) corresponds to the monitoring of the independent fail-safe oscillator used by the FS26 fail-safe state machine. According to the FS26 Safety Manual, this mechanism is implemented within the ASIL D fail-safe domain.

You can find this representation in Figure 8. Safety architecture.

I hope this information has helped you, please let me know if you need help with anything else.

Have a great day and best of luck.

0 Kudos
Reply
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2403332%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EClarifications%20required%20regarding%20Fail%20safe%20oscillator%20drift%20Fault(FS_OSC_DRIFT)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2403332%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Nxp%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20been%20using%20FS2613%20SBC%20chip%20and%20I%20found%20safety%20requirement%20(SM48)%20which%20is%20related%20to%26nbsp%3BFail%20safe%20oscillator%20drift%20Fault%20(FS_OSC_DRIFT).%20But%20ASIL%20level%20information%20is%20not%20available%20in%20reference%20manual.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESo%2C%20kindly%20clarify%20that%2C%20this%20fault%20comes%20under%20either%20ASIL%20B%2F%20ASIL%20D%2F%20QM%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESivahari%20G%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2403405%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%20translate%3D%22no%22%3ERe%3A%20Clarifications%20required%20regarding%20Fail%20safe%20oscillator%20drift%20Fault(FS_OSC_DRIFT)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2403405%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EHello%20Sivahari%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EGood%20day!%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThe%20FS_OSC_DRIFT%20fault%20(SM48)%20corresponds%20to%20the%20monitoring%20of%20the%20independent%20fail-safe%20oscillator%20used%20by%20the%20FS26%20fail-safe%20state%20machine.%20According%20to%20the%20FS26%20Safety%20Manual%2C%20this%20mechanism%20is%20implemented%20within%20the%20ASIL%20D%20fail-safe%20domain.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EYou%20can%20find%20this%20representation%20in%20Figure%208.%20Safety%20architecture.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20hope%20this%20information%20has%20helped%20you%2C%20please%20let%20me%20know%20if%20you%20need%20help%20with%20anything%20else.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EHave%20a%20great%20day%20and%20best%20of%20luck.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E