Hello @Shio_Tamba ,
Actually these addresses are read only, so would not change them at all.
Have a great day,
Kan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
- Actually these addresses are read only, so would not change them at all.
This fact is already understanding.
I think that the RFU bits will use for the future function of the PN5180. (because RFU = reserved for future use.)
I guess that when you(NXP) assign the function to RFU bits, the specification numbers (e.g. FW version, EEPROM version etc.) will change of the PN5180 chip.
This is correct?
Sincerely,
Hello @Shio_Tamba ,
Well, from my understanding, when RFU bits have a new definition, the firmware should also be updated.
Have a great day,
Kan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------