Choosing MIFARE card reader IC

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Choosing MIFARE card reader IC

1,147 Views
barmagan
Contributor I

For a battery-powered prepaid metering application using contactless cards, I need to select a reader IC compatible with MIFARE 1K or 4K cards. I came across the widely used MFRC522, but I noticed it is not recommended for new designs.

The CLRC663 Plus is recommended instead, but I also found the MFRC63103 and MFRC63003HN while researching.

Although the CLRC663 Plus supports more protocols, my only requirement is to read and write MIFARE cards. Considering battery life, would one of the MFRC chips mentioned above be a better choice? I would appreciate your suggestions.

Additionally, I noticed that the CLRC663 evaluation board features a much larger PCB antenna compared to the commonly available RC522 evaluation modules. Why is that? Is it possible to reduce the PCB antenna footprint?

0 Kudos
Reply
5 Replies

1,083 Views
barmagan
Contributor I

Thank you for your response @jimmychan.  Plain logic says MFRC63103 or MFRC63003HN could be better for battery life. Can you please explain your reasoning? Please give a little detail. 

0 Kudos
Reply

1,066 Views
jimmychan
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

MFRC63103 or MFRC63003HN are fit your basic requirements. My suggestion is just for your reference because CLRC663plus support more protocols, it has BGA package, and it is in Product Longevity Program.  

 

clrc663_compare.png

0 Kudos
Reply

1,062 Views
barmagan
Contributor I

Thanks @jimmychan .. Since the family members are pin compatible I can later upgrade my hardware from MFRC631 plus to CLRC633 plus  without changing the PCB layout.

Is that right? Or do I need to consider other than PCB footprints?

0 Kudos
Reply

1,025 Views
jimmychan
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Yes, right. They are fully pin compatible.

0 Kudos
Reply

1,100 Views
jimmychan
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

I would suggest CLRC663 plus.

For the antenna, please read AN11019

0 Kudos
Reply