2406990_en-US

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

2406990_en-US

2406990_en-US

Clarifications required for SBCFS2613 Main state Faults reaction

Hi NXP,

Could you please confirm whether a default fail-safe reaction (assertion of FSXB and RSTB) is configured for the following faults in the respective registers?

  • M_TSD_FLG
  • M_REG_FLG
  • M_VSUP_FLG

Since the faults in the above registers are configured to provide an INTB indication, clarification is required on whether they also have any default fail-safe reaction, such as assertion of FSXB and/or RSTB.

Thanks,

Sivahari G



Re: Clarifications required for SBCFS2613 Main state Faults reaction

Hi RafaR,

I couldn't identify exactly which PN you were referring to?

I am using MFS2613AMDA6.

A fail-safe reaction such as FS0B (FSXB) and/or RSTB assertion is not automatically associated with the flag itself and depends on the corresponding fail-safe configuration.

Yes, absolutely for all regulators UV/OV fault has failsafe configuration registers "FS_I_OVUV_SAFE_REACTION1" and " FS_I_OVUV_SAFE_REACTION2 ". But Is there any provision to configure fail-safe reaction for all regulator Over Current Faults? since we have provisions to configure INTB masking/unmasking for those faults.

Example OC Faults(VBSTOV_I, VBSTOC_I, VPREOC_I, TRK1OC_I, COREOC_I)

Thanks,

Sivahari G

Re: Clarifications required for SBCFS2613 Main state Faults reaction

Hello Sivahari

Good day!

I couldn't identify exactly which PN you were referring to, but in general this applies to all versions of FS26.

RafaR_0-1787266460038.pngRafaR_0-1787266460038.pngRafaR_0-1787266460038.pngRafaR_0-1787266460038.png


In summary, the flags in M_TSD_FLG, M_REG_FLG, and M_VSUP_FLG are interrupt sources by default. A fail-safe reaction such as FS0B (FSXB) and/or RSTB assertion is not automatically associated with the flag itself and depends on the corresponding fail-safe configuration, with TSD faults being an explicit example that can be configured to escalate into Deep Fail Safe.

I hope this information has helped you, please let me know if you need help with anything else.

Have a great day and best of luck.

Re: Clarifications required for SBCFS2613 Main state Faults reaction

Hello Sivahari

Good day!

Unfortunately, the FS26 does not have an equivalent to FS_I_OVUV_SAFE_REACTION1/2 for currents, but, all LDOs and TRKs have a current limiter, so they should remain safe even if an overclock is detected, giving you time to check it. Depending on where it originates, a different process may begin, for example, VPRE.

RafaR_0-1787355219229.pngRafaR_0-1787355219229.pngRafaR_0-1787355219229.png


I hope this information has helped you, please let me know if you need help with anything else.

Have a great day and best of luck.

タグ(1)
評価なし
バージョン履歴
最終更新日:
7 時間前
更新者: