1805009_en-US

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

1805009_en-US

1805009_en-US

FXLS896xAF AN12004 - 'No Motion' vs 'Freefall'

In the AN12004 Application Note, the basis for detecting  both 'No Motion' (3.2) and  'Freefall' (3.4) is that all 3 axes are within some threshold.

So that's the key to distinguishing 'No Motion' and  'Freefall' - as they're both detected on the same basis?

AccelerometersRe: FXLS896xAF AN12004 - 'No Motion' vs 'Freefall'

Still wondering about the significance of Data[n]-Data[n-1] vs Absolute reference?


Also, rather than using the 'AND' logic of all 3 axes, what would be the pros/cons of just using the VECM (vector magnitude) ?

Re: FXLS896xAF AN12004 - 'No Motion' vs 'Freefall'

So you're just assuming that a "brief" period of "no motion" must be "freefall" ?


The other difference is that the "no motion" example uses the Data[n]-Data[n-1] reference update mode, whereas "freefall" uses the Absolute mode.

What's the significance in that?


Re: FXLS896xAF AN12004 - 'No Motion' vs 'Freefall'

Hello Andrew,

The key to distinguishing between the two lies in the setting of the debounce time (2.55s vs. 100ms). And yes, we also recommend to use slightly different threshold values (±100mg vs. ±200mg).

BR, Tomas


Tags (1)
No ratings
Version history
Last update:
‎02-04-2026 06:22 AM
Updated by: