LS1028A POR Configuration Timing

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LS1028A POR Configuration Timing

204 Views
jchiu1
Contributor I

Hello,

From the data sheet timing specification in Table 13 (pg. 75), does that means POR configs has to follow all requirements below?

  1. Valid for 4 SYSCLK (40 ns) before the rising edge of PORESET_B
  2. Valid for 2 SYSCLK (20 ns) after the rising edge of PORESET_B
  3. Tri-state within 5 SYSCLK (50 ns) of the rising edge of PORESET_B

Note: I assume SYSCLK is 100 MHz.

Data Sheet Table 13:

jchiu1_0-1718399700951.png

If that is true, the LS1028A Reference Design Board CPLD seems violating the maximum valid-to-high impedance time requirement.

I ran the simulation using the provided code, and the CFG_DRV (signals control POR configs) tri-state after 6 HOT_CLK(25MHz) (240 ns) after the rising edge of PORESET_B (see waveform screenshot below. Signal relevant to this question is in color magenta).

Is there any reason why the CPLD holds POR configs signals longer than the maximum time on data sheet? Or did I misunderstand the meaning of the “maximum valid-to-high impedance time” from the data sheet? Thanks.

jchiu1_1-1718399700974.png

 

0 Kudos
Reply
3 Replies

119 Views
yipingwang
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

If CPLD holds POR configs signals longer than the maximum time on data sheet, it is not correct. Please note that datasheet supercedes RDB and datasheet should be followed wherever contention is seen.

0 Kudos
Reply

165 Views
yipingwang
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Confirming with the AE team.

0 Kudos
Reply

133 Views
jchiu1
Contributor I

@yipingwang Following up to see if you have any answer from AE team. Thanks.

0 Kudos
Reply