LPC55S69 power rise issue, please help to revise the PCB design

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LPC55S69 power rise issue, please help to revise the PCB design

1,051 Views
vyacheslavguzhv
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

According to the LPC55S6x Errata sheet, the clause 3.26 VBAT_DCDC.1: The minimum rise time of the power supply must be2.6 ms or slower for Tamb = -40 C, and 0.5 ms or slower for Tamb = 0
C to +105 C.

 

The customer design for the power supply circuits is exactly the same as on NXP LPC55S69-EVK board.

Please kindly suggest how the circuits should be modified in order to meet the errata requirements for 0,5 ms rise time and 2,6 ms rise time. Apriori customer's PCB take the power from external device designed by other companies. Its hard to predict the parameters of external DCDC, therefore lets assume external DCDC rise time is almost immediate. 

thanks!

Slava

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
Reply
3 Replies

1,015 Views
ZhangJennie
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi Slava

We recommend to use LDO/DCDC with soft start function which can control the start up time, for example, RT8272, AP62200 series and etc. This will make the power supply circuit simple.

Have a nice day,

Jun Zhang

0 Kudos
Reply

122 Views
danielholala
Senior Contributor II

Dear @ZhangJennie ,

I hope you found time to resolve this issue with a revised circuit design.

However, the application note AN12325 "Using the DC-DC feature" has not changed since and does not seem to address or even mention the use of a "slow start".

I also use the circuit design recommended in the application note and see bad startup behavior (MCU does not start) on some boards.

Please, could you present your solution for the benefit of everybody who uses LPC55xx MCUs or even better, provide an updated AN12325 that addresses this issue.

 

Thanks.
Dan

 

0 Kudos
Reply

1,027 Views
ZhangJennie
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

 vyacheslavguzhv

We are checking this internally. Will keep you informed.

Thanks,

Jun Zhang

0 Kudos
Reply