I see that some of the demos and/or examples use the fsl_flash driver, and others use the fsl_ftfx_flash driiver. At first glance the APIs look the same. However, the underlying code is different. For example, fsl_flash has a mechanism to copy and execute the driver functions from RAM, which is not present in fsl_ftfx_flash.
Which is preferred?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi Denis Collis,
fsl_ftfx also copy the run command to ram, please check this code:
When you use the flash, please copy the launch command code to RAM.
Wish it helps you!
Have a great day,
Kerry
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Denis Collis,
fsl_ftfx also copy the run command to ram, please check this code:
When you use the flash, please copy the launch command code to RAM.
Wish it helps you!
Have a great day,
Kerry
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------