MC33901WEF instead of this part, can i use this part TJA1042T/3,118 ?.

取消
显示结果 
显示  仅  | 搜索替代 
您的意思是: 

MC33901WEF instead of this part, can i use this part TJA1042T/3,118 ?.

2,209 次查看
tataraok6
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

MC33901WEF instead of this part, can i use this part TJA1042T/3,118 ?.

Is there any half duplex/full duplex difference there between these two parts?

0 项奖励
回复
4 回复数

2,079 次查看
xiangjun_rong
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi, Tatarao,

The CAN transceiver MC33901WEF is obsolete, it is okay to use  TJA1042T/3 to replace the MC33901WEF .

Hope it can help you

BR

Xiangjun Rong

0 项奖励
回复

2,079 次查看
tataraok6
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Xiangjun Rong,

Thanks.

TJA1042T/3 part description showing as Half duplex, but MC33901WEF part description not showing any thing like Half or full duplex. So any difference is there between these two parts about half or full duplex?

Regards,

Tatarao k

0 项奖励
回复

2,079 次查看
xiangjun_rong
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi, Tatarao,

As you know that CAN BUS is a BUS architecture, so the CAN bus is HALF-DUPLEX, in other words, you can not transmit and receive simultaneously.

I think the TJA1042T/3 part can replace the MC33901WEF.

BR

XiangJun Rong

0 项奖励
回复

2,079 次查看
tataraok6
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Thanks

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

0 项奖励
回复