Which HTTPd is better for M5225X?

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

Which HTTPd is better for M5225X?

1,496件の閲覧回数
allankliu
Contributor III

Hi,

 

I am trying to complete the existing demo http web servers with necessary features: HTTP basic authentication, POST method and DHCP client. I evaluated MQX demo project, Niche + CMX demo, digibutler projects, FreeRTOS demo, uC/OS-II demo. According to my test result, the MQX demo has the most stable performance. So I hope to use MQX demo as code base, although Digibutler has implemented the authentication part. And I saw the authentication code is implemented in RTCS/MQX. However, the RTCS pdf in MQX is very comprehensive, but not too much on http server.

 

Does anyone know how to use the RTCS HTTP? 

ラベル(1)
0 件の賞賛
返信
1 返信

799件の閲覧回数
mjbcswitzerland
Specialist V

Hi

 

You may like to also look at the uTasker project (normally a M5225X is running on-line at demo.uTasker.com). This includes HTTP with post (ARP, RARP, ICMP, IP, UDP, DHCP, DNS, TFTP, TCP, dynamic HTTP, FTP, SMTP, POP3, TELNET, NetBIOS and VLAN), with DHCP and much more...
http://www.utasker.com/kirin3.html

 

Regards

 

Mark

 

 

0 件の賞賛
返信