Adding more contradictions:
28.6.4 Port QA and QB Data Direction Register (DDRQA & DDRQB)
DDRQA and DDRQB are associated with port QA and QB digital I/O signals. Setting a bit in these
registers configures the corresponding signal as an output.
So far so good. The register description diagram for "Figure 28-6. QADC Port QA Data Direction Register (DDRQA)" shows the "DDRAn" bits as "R/W".
But for Port QB, in the diagram "Figure 28-7. Port QB Data Direction Register (DDRQB)", bits "DDRBn" are shown as READ-ONLY and initialised to ZERO.
Why? These chips are made by cutting-and-pasting hardware modules together. The manuals are made by pasting the associated chapters describing those modules together.
So the best way to follow this process and the errors it introduces is to conduct "archaeology", by reading all of the manuals that use a particular module, and then note the "mutation rate" as some errors get fixed and new ones get introduced.
Here's a worked example for the "PIT" in the Coldfire chips, tracking the problems back to the original 1998 use in the MMC2001:
https://community.freescale.com/message/70616#70616
The QADC was originally designed and documented in 1995, and probably used in one of the 68300 or HC11 chips:
http://cache.freescale.com/files/microcontrollers/doc/ref_manual/QADCRM.pdf?fsrch=1&sr=4&pageNum=1
The QADC was also used and documented in "MMC2114 Advance Information Reference Manual (REV 1)" in 2002:
http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/ref_manual/MMC2114.pdf?fsrch=1&sr=1&pageNum=1
In that implementation, both DDRQA and DDRQB are read-write. The text in that manual in section "19.8.4 Port QA and QB Data Direction Register (DDRQA and DDRQB)" is identical to that quoted above. So that section was cut/pasted into the MCF5282 manual, and missed being changed to match the MCF5282 changes.
> It's unfortunate that the manuals can't be trusted...
Those old manuals are a lot better than the later ones. See how they are now:
https://community.freescale.com/message/426065#426065
https://community.freescale.com/message/425415#425415
> Has anybody here in the forum used PQB as digital outputs?
> I'm hoping Freescale can clarify.
Freescale don't seem to be participating in this forum any more.
I think I've done enough "reverse engineering" on the manuals to answer your question.
The only real way to get definitive answers on these sort of questions is to run the tests on the hardware yourself. You'd have eventually found that DDRQB is a rather useless "Read only" place-holder register.
Tom