MC9S08JM16 Indexed Addressing

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

MC9S08JM16 Indexed Addressing

948 Views
LiveMike
Contributor II

Last question for today:

 

How do I use Indexed Addressing?

 

At the top of my code, in my RAM section, starts with something like ORG RAMStart, I am "declaring" some variables/registers, and at the end I want to have an "array" of registers, which could be a few or a lot of registers.

 

VAR1DS1

VAR2DS1

...

 

ARRAY:

ARRAY1DS1

ARRAY2DS1

ARRAY3DS1

ARRAY4DS1

...

 

I think putting a colon next to the first "ARRAY" is just making it a label, not sure.

 

So when I want to store something to the 2nd ARRAY down, would I use:

 

STAARRAY, X

 

assuming the accumulator has what I want to store, and X is 2.

 

What if the "array" ends up being 15 registers:

 

LDAARRAY, X

 

X is 15 to get the data that far down?

 

Does then name of the following ARRAY1, ARRAY2 even matter?

 

Or do I just use

 

ARRAYDS16

 

knowing I'll need 4-16 registers??

 

I'm really having a hard time understanding the way Assembly uses variables/registers compared to an HLL like Java :smileysad:

 

Thanks in advance,

 

-Mike

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
8 Replies

741 Views
peg
Senior Contributor IV

LiveMike wrote:

Last question for today:

 

How do I use Indexed Addressing?

 

At the top of my code, in my RAM section, starts with something like ORG RAMStart, I am "declaring" some variables/registers, and at the end I want to have an "array" of registers, which could be a few or a lot of registers.

 

VAR1DS1

VAR2DS1

...

 

ARRAY:

ARRAY1DS1

ARRAY2DS1

ARRAY3DS1

ARRAY4DS1

...

 

I think putting a colon next to the first "ARRAY" is just making it a label, not sure.

 

Having text with no whitespace to the left of it makes it a label, the colon is optional.

 

So when I want to store something to the 2nd ARRAY down, would I use:

 

STAARRAY, X

 

assuming the accumulator has what I want to store, and X is 2.

 

Yes, but don't forget the first item is at offset zero.

 

What if the "array" ends up being 15 registers:

 

LDAARRAY, X

 

X is 15 to get the data that far down?

 

x = 14 is the last item of a array of size 15, as above.

 

Does then name of the following ARRAY1, ARRAY2 even matter?

 

No, if you want to directly reference an item in the array without using indexed addressing you can use ARRAY+2

 

Or do I just use

 

ARRAYDS16

 

knowing I'll need 4-16 registers??

 

Normally this is what you would do.

 

I'm really having a hard time understanding the way Assembly uses variables/registers compared to an HLL like Java :smileysad:

 

Thanks in advance,

 

-Mike


Hello LiveMike,

 

See the comments interspersed above.

The validity of my comments may vary depending on the unspecified assembler that you are using.

 

0 Kudos

741 Views
LiveMike
Contributor II

Peg,

 

Wow, thanks, that was very helpful!!  One more thing though, I'm working with some old code that has this at the top where the rest of the variables are declared in RAM...

 

ARRAYNAME:

VAR1    DS    1

VAR2    DS    1

VAR3    DS    1

VARX    DS    8

 

So NO whitespace before "ARRAYNAME:" makes it a label, but can it be the "label" of an array??

 

Elsewhere in the code, sometimes the data in VAR2 for example, is manipulated using "VAR2" and in other places it is manipulated by using "'ARRAYNAME, X" with x being 1.  The code seems to work, but is it really possible to acces this register/byte using it's name "VAR2" or it's location in the array "ARRAYNAME, X" or "ARRAYNAME+1"??

 

Thanks so much!!

 

-Mike

0 Kudos

741 Views
bigmac
Specialist III

Hello Mike,

 

Each of the following code snippets will achieve a write to the same memory location -

 

   ldhx  #ARRAYNAME

   sta   2,x

 

 

   ldhx  #VAR3

   sta   ,x

 

 

   ldhx  #2

   sta   ARRAYNAME,x

 

 

   sta   VAR3

 

Regards,

Mac

 

0 Kudos

741 Views
LiveMike
Contributor II

Mac,

 

Again, thanks so much!!  You're my fav on the forums, soooo very knowledgeable!!  That was exactly what I needed to see!  BUT...  haha, always a BUT...  I have seen this in my 'old' code I'm working with:

 

LDA    ARRAYNAME-1, X

 

So is that loading the accumlator withe the (X - 1) element of the array?

 

I need to create a new array from scratch, but I have to figure out what the original is doing

 

And let me make sure I'm doing this correct (and hopefully efficient)...

 

Store the numbers 25,15,7,2,1 to 5 elements of an array...

 

 

DATAARRAY:MEMBERS  DS 1CARS  DS 1TRUCKS  DS 1BOATS  DS 1BIKES  DS 1

 

CLRXLDA #25  ; 25 MembersSTA DATAARRAY, XINCXLDA #15  ; 15 CarsSTA DATAARRAY, XINCXLDA #7  ; 7 TrucksSTA DATAARRAY, XINCXLDA #2  ; 2 BoatsSTA DATAARRAY, XINCXLDA #1  ; 1 BikeSTA DATAARRAY, X

 And then I could also updat Trucks later on like this:

LDA #8STA TRUCKS

 And lets say I wanted to update Boats AND Bikes, how do I say "array element + 1"...

LDX #3  ; 'Boats' is element 3LDA #5  ; new number of BoatsSTA DATAARRAY, XLDA #3  ; new number of BikesSTA DATAARRY + 1, X

 I know I could INCX before updating Bikes, but maybe its 13 elements away...

 

Anyway, THANK YOU SO MUCH for all the info and help.

 

-Mike

 

0 Kudos

740 Views
bigmac
Specialist III

Hello Mike,

 

Consider the following code snippet -

 

INIT_TAB:  ; Array initialisation data

           DC.B   25             ; Members

           DC.B   15,7,2,1       ; Cars, trucks, boats, bikes

 

...

           ; For indexed addressing, make sure that H is correctly set

           ; Initialise array - method 1

           LDHX    #5             ; Elements in array

LOOP1:     LDA     INIT_TAB-1,X

           STA     DATAARRAY-1,X

           DBNZX   LOOP1

 

          

           ; Initialise array - method 2

           LDHX    #5             ; Elements in array

LOOP1:     DECX

           LDA     INIT_TAB,X

           STA     DATAARRAY,X

           TSTX

           BNE     LOOP1          ; Loop while X > 0

 

Compare the two methods of initialising the array.  My personal preference would be the first method.

 

If DATAARRAY happens to reside in Z_RAM, you could alternatively use MOV instructions for slightly better efficiency,

i.e.       MOV    #8,TRUCKS

 

           MOV    #5,DATAARRAY+3

           MOV    #3,DATAARRAY+4

 

Using indexed addressing in this instance is probably of no advantage.

 

Regards,

Mac

 

0 Kudos

740 Views
peg
Senior Contributor IV

Hi Mike,

 

Using ARRAYNAME-1 is probably to cater for the fact that the first element is at zero offset and the calculation for the index produces avalue in the range 1 to ARRAYSIZE.

 

What you have shown is all correct.

 

Obviously, if you are going to load the array like in your second box then indexed addressing is not the most efficient way to do it. As you have labels for all the elements writing directly to those also self-documents (like 3rd box)

 

Don't force yourself to use indexed addressing just because you can or think you need to for an array.

Use the most efficient (or self explanatory) mode for what you are trying to do

 

Indexed addressing is mostly used for sequential accesses in a loop or plucking a value out of a table based on a calculation which is then used for the index into that table (array).

 

 

0 Kudos

740 Views
peg
Senior Contributor IV

Hi Mike,

 


LiveMike wrote:

Peg,

 

Wow, thanks, that was very helpful!!  One more thing though, I'm working with some old code that has this at the top where the rest of the variables are declared in RAM...

 

ARRAYNAME:

VAR1    DS    1

VAR2    DS    1

VAR3    DS    1

VARX    DS    8

 

So NO whitespace before "ARRAYNAME:" makes it a label, but can it be the "label" of an array??

 

Elsewhere in the code, sometimes the data in VAR2 for example, is manipulated using "VAR2" and in other places it is manipulated by using "'ARRAYNAME, X" with x being 1.  The code seems to work, but is it really possible to acces this register/byte using it's name "VAR2" or it's location in the array "ARRAYNAME, X" or "ARRAYNAME+1"??

 

Thanks so much!!

 

-Mike


There is no formal declaration of the array.

In assembler an array is just a number of sequential address locations. There is nothing to warn you when you run off the end etc

As there is no instructions after ARRAYNAME: the address is still the same for VAR1.

ARRAYNAME and VAR1 are labels at the same address.

Either label could be used to index into the array as there is no formal array, just more memory following that label.

 

Heck if you had a label three locations subsequent to this you could index from there with an extra three added to your index

 

There are very few rules with assembler. This allows you to do wonderful things or to stuff up completely leaving you to figure out why.

 

0 Kudos

740 Views
LiveMike
Contributor II

There are spaces/tabs between VAR1 and DS and 1 and LDA and STA etc...

 

-Mike

0 Kudos