i.MX6DQ Junction to Case.

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

i.MX6DQ Junction to Case.

Jump to solution
1,428 Views
satoshishimoda
Senior Contributor I

Hi community,

I have a question about i.MX6DQ thermal resistance.

Please see Table 5 in IMC6DQCEC Rev.3.

I understand junction temperature is present by the following equation.

"Junction to Case" (< 0.1) = ("Junction Temperature" - "Case Temperature") / "Power consumption" : [equation 1]

=> "Junction Temp" = "Junction to Case" / "Power consumption" + "Case Temp" : [equation 2]

Then, should I assign "0.1" to "Junction to Case" in equation 2 to calculate "Junction Temp"?

Or can I think "Junction Temp" = "Case Temp" because "Junction to Case" is small value sufficiently?

Best Regards,

Satoshi Shimoda

Labels (2)
0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
1,201 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

For assurance, please use R theta-JC = 0.1 , especially when thermal estimations are provided for

board, that should work under "hot" environment; when the results of the calculations violate the design

requirments (if the resulting junction temperature is more than 105'C). In these case, you might use special

CFD software (e.g. FloTHERM) to make thermal analysis.

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
Reply
5 Replies
1,201 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Generally You are right. But please note, Theta-JC parameter is suitable for estimations

during heat sink selection, since it is measured by the cold plate method.

Please look at side 83 (Appendix D, Heat Sink Selection) of AN4579 “i.MX 6 Series Thermal

Management Guidelines”

http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/app_note/AN4579.pdf


Have a great day,
Yuri

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos
Reply
1,201 Views
satoshishimoda
Senior Contributor I

Hi Yuri,

> Generally You are right. But please note,

Excuse me, did you said which my understanding is correct?

> Then, should I assign "0.1" to "Junction to Case" in equation 2 to calculate "Junction Temp"?

> Or can I think "Junction Temp" = "Case Temp" because "Junction to Case" is small value sufficiently?

Best Regards,

Satoshi Shimoda

0 Kudos
Reply
1,201 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Please look at my comments below.

1.
> Excuse me, did you said which my understanding is correct?


Yes.

2.
> Then, should I assign "0.1" to "Junction to Case" in equation 2 to calculate "Junction Temp"?

> Or can I think "Junction Temp" = "Case Temp" because "Junction to Case" is small value sufficiently?

You may apply any mentioned approach.

3.

Again, I would like to emphasize the point, that Theta-JC parameter is used in context of thermal model,

mentioned in the side 83.

0 Kudos
Reply
1,201 Views
satoshishimoda
Senior Contributor I

Hi Yuri,

Sorry, I have not understood yet.

> 3.

> Again, I would like to emphasize the point, that Theta-JC parameter is used in context of thermal model,

> mentioned in the side 83.

Slide 83.png

OK, I should use this equation to calculate Tj.

Then, which value (0 or 0.1) should I assign to R theta-JC?

Best Regards,

Satoshi Shimoda

0 Kudos
Reply
1,202 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

For assurance, please use R theta-JC = 0.1 , especially when thermal estimations are provided for

board, that should work under "hot" environment; when the results of the calculations violate the design

requirments (if the resulting junction temperature is more than 105'C). In these case, you might use special

CFD software (e.g. FloTHERM) to make thermal analysis.

0 Kudos
Reply