PF53 variants package marking

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

PF53 variants package marking

168 Views
marco_muratori
Contributor III

Dears,

In one of our board we are using both the PF5301 (8A) and the PF5302 (15A) options of the component, is it possible to tell one component from the other from the package markings?

I see no reference to the usage of different codes in the datasheet of the component, nor a general definition of the marking.

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
Reply
3 Replies

133 Views
JosephAtNXP
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi,

Thank you for your interest in NXP Semiconductor products,

Top marking differentiates them, the heading should contain the Part Number

PF53XX.

It would depend on the part type, if they are for manufacture or they are samples, they should be different though,

Regards

0 Kudos
Reply

79 Views
marco_muratori
Contributor III

Thank you for your reply, unfortunately there seems to be no text differences over the two components.

What is the marking spec for these devices? I could not find any in the technical datasheet.

Tags (1)

5 Views
JosephAtNXP
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi @marco_muratori,

From internal research, the package should have three text lines,

First should be e.g. MPF5302 and second line e.g. AVNAAEP, manufacturing part numbers should be discernible from PF53 parts and from different OTP versions, probably you have prototype parts,

Regards,

0 Kudos
Reply
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2366868%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EPF53%20variants%20package%20marking%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2366868%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EDears%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIn%20one%20of%20our%20board%20we%20are%20using%20both%20the%20PF5301%20(8A)%20and%20the%20PF5302%20(15A)%20options%20of%20the%20component%2C%20is%20it%20possible%20to%20tell%20one%20component%20from%20the%20other%20from%20the%20package%20markings%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20see%20no%20reference%20to%20the%20usage%20of%20different%20codes%20in%20the%20datasheet%20of%20the%20component%2C%20nor%20a%20general%20definition%20of%20the%20marking.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-2366868%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EPMIC%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2367114%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%20translate%3D%22no%22%3ERe%3A%20PF53%20variants%20package%20marking%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2367114%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThank%20you%20for%20your%20interest%20in%20NXP%20Semiconductor%20products%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ETop%20marking%20differentiates%20them%2C%20the%20heading%20should%20contain%20the%20Part%20Number%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EPF53XX.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIt%20would%20depend%20on%20the%20part%20type%2C%20if%20they%20are%20for%20manufacture%20or%20they%20are%20samples%2C%20they%20should%20be%20different%20though%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ERegards%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E