Further clarifications for NXP FMEDA

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Further clarifications for NXP FMEDA

334 Views
francis_fu
Contributor I
Dear NXP Experts, We have some detailed questions about the FMEDA from NXP, could you please help to clarify them? Thanks! Q1: We use several S32KXX series MCUs in our products. There are several FMEDA excels (classified as Clock, Core, Flash, Peripheral, Power, SRAM etc.) which we can customize with the support from local FAEs. Inside the excel for "Peripheral" element, I can find a "Pin example" failure rate. Does it mean that Pin example x Pin number = package failure rate by IEC TR62380? (I can find the package failure rate inside a separate document based on calculation using IEC TR 62380, but there is no clear hint how package failure rate is used in FMEDA excels) Q2: Just take one example, for S32K116 I can find a document titled "S32K116_FIT_Rate_Calculation.pdf", performed according to IEC 62380, where Die failure rate is quite low (0.233). However inside the FMEDA excels, the total failure rate for a SRAM is much larger (~300 fits) than that inside the above document. As I understand, the failure rates for Soft error upsets for RAM / Soft error latch-up for RAM / Soft error rate of flip-flops should come from JESD89. Is there any further evidence about how this part of failure rates is calculated and then used in final FMEDA excel sheet? Thanks BR Francis
Tags (1)
0 Kudos
1 Reply

310 Views
aarul
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Ans 1: The total package failure rate is divided by total pins of the device to get the failure rate of a single pin. This failure rate is used to model dedicated Pins (such as supply pins) in the Power FMEDA. And we provide this failure rate as an example in Peripheral FMEDA to enable our customers perform the pin analysis based on their application and number of safety related pins.

 

Ans 2: The die failure rate through IEC 62380 is for permanent faults only. You are right that additional failure rate is due to soft-error and we indeed use JESD89 to calculate the transient failure rate. We have provided some information around it in the safety analysis reports (for s32K344 they are here: https://community.nxp.com/t5/SafeAssure-NDA-group/Safety-Analysis-Report-S32K144/ta-p/1107391)

I hope this helps.

Regards

-Aarul

0 Kudos