Keil vs IAR

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 
1,525件の閲覧回数
Cdn_aye
Senior Contributor I

I was hoping that someone could share their opinion on the Keil vs IAR toolchain using MQX. We want to change from CW to a more stable IDE and compiler, but retain the FSL MQX system. I have seen in the past that there are users on this forum using IAR and Keil. The price between the two seems close, if we retain the MQX middleware.

Thanks

Robert

タグ(5)
1 解決策
475件の閲覧回数
BielikM
Contributor III

Hi,

There are couple of advantages of IAR. So far:

- Full featured task-aware debugging (Keil only has simple MQX viewer)

- Support for CortexM and CortexA, support for multi-core debugging (Vybrid)


Regards,

Martin

元の投稿で解決策を見る

1 返信
476件の閲覧回数
BielikM
Contributor III

Hi,

There are couple of advantages of IAR. So far:

- Full featured task-aware debugging (Keil only has simple MQX viewer)

- Support for CortexM and CortexA, support for multi-core debugging (Vybrid)


Regards,

Martin