one of my customer made a spc5775board,he did not bull down ether of the boot config pins,

取消
显示结果 
显示  仅  | 搜索替代 
您的意思是: 
已解决

one of my customer made a spc5775board,he did not bull down ether of the boot config pins,

跳至解决方案
850 次查看
steven_zhang
Contributor V

one of my customer made a spc5775board,he can not connect his board to a PC with a muli-link ,  should the BOOTCFG pins be pull down to the GND?

0 项奖励
回复
1 解答
836 次查看
davidtosenovjan
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

This device exist only in 416-pin version that does not have BOOTCFG[0] and defaults to zero. BOOTCFG[1] needs to be grounded if MCU is supposed to boot from internal flash memory.

Another option is to program Miscellaneous DCF record to choose right booting options. Pay attention to following tools (use MPC5777C DCF Configurator):
https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx-Knowledge-Base/MPC57xx-DCF-records/ta-p/1114884

In such case having BOOTCFG[1] untreated would not cause any issue. Just noting programming of DCF records is not trivial task - user can easily destroy the chip. Please read carefully all instruction to understand the procedure correctly.

 

在原帖中查看解决方案

0 项奖励
回复
1 回复
837 次查看
davidtosenovjan
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

This device exist only in 416-pin version that does not have BOOTCFG[0] and defaults to zero. BOOTCFG[1] needs to be grounded if MCU is supposed to boot from internal flash memory.

Another option is to program Miscellaneous DCF record to choose right booting options. Pay attention to following tools (use MPC5777C DCF Configurator):
https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx-Knowledge-Base/MPC57xx-DCF-records/ta-p/1114884

In such case having BOOTCFG[1] untreated would not cause any issue. Just noting programming of DCF records is not trivial task - user can easily destroy the chip. Please read carefully all instruction to understand the procedure correctly.

 

0 项奖励
回复