MPC5777M: XBIC Master/Slave Numbering

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

MPC5777M: XBIC Master/Slave Numbering

439 Views
D75
Contributor I

Hello,

I am seeking clarification on the numbering used for masters and slaves in XBIC_0 and XBIC_1 on the MPC5777M.

When attempting to inject an error on XBIC_0 during a write transfer from core 2 (the IOP core) to internal SRAM, I followed the XBAR port numbering and selected master 4 and slave 4. However, no error was detected—the write transfer completed normally. If I select master 2 instead — which seems unrelated to the expected data path — an error is detected.

I have observed similar behavior on XBIC_1: using master 4 does not result in the expected error detection, while selecting master 2 does.

Could anyone confirm the correct numbering for masters and slaves in XBIC_0 and XBIC_1? Are the XBIC and XBAR numberings different?

Thank you in advance!

Tags (1)
0 Kudos
Reply
1 Reply

302 Views
davidtosenovjan
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

XBIC chapter uses term 'master ID' what could be logical ID probably as follows:

image.png

 

0 Kudos
Reply
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2334148%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EMPC5777M%3A%20XBIC%20Master%2FSlave%20Numbering%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2334148%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EHello%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20seeking%20clarification%20on%20the%20numbering%20used%20for%20masters%20and%20slaves%20in%20XBIC_0%20and%20XBIC_1%20on%20the%20MPC5777M.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWhen%20attempting%20to%20inject%20an%20error%20on%20XBIC_0%20during%20a%20write%20transfer%20from%20core%202%20(the%20IOP%20core)%20to%20internal%20SRAM%2C%20I%20followed%20the%20XBAR%20port%20numbering%20and%20selected%20master%204%20and%20slave%204.%20However%2C%20no%20error%20was%20detected%E2%80%94the%20write%20transfer%20completed%20normally.%20If%20I%20select%20master%202%20instead%20%E2%80%94%20which%20seems%20unrelated%20to%20the%20expected%20data%20path%20%E2%80%94%20an%20error%20is%20detected.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20observed%20similar%20behavior%20on%20XBIC_1%3A%20using%20master%204%20does%20not%20result%20in%20the%20expected%20error%20detection%2C%20while%20selecting%20master%202%20does.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ECould%20anyone%20confirm%20the%20correct%20numbering%20for%20masters%20and%20slaves%20in%20XBIC_0%20and%20XBIC_1%3F%20Are%20the%20XBIC%20and%20XBAR%20numberings%20different%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThank%20you%20in%20advance!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2347015%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%20translate%3D%22no%22%3ERe%3A%20MPC5777M%3A%20XBIC%20Master%2FSlave%20Numbering%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2347015%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EXBIC%20chapter%20uses%20term%20'master%20ID'%20what%20could%20be%20logical%20ID%20probably%20as%20follows%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22image.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20873px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22image.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20873px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.nxp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F381562i8E48534F53BA458D%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22image.png%22%20alt%3D%22image.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E