TFBGA208 footprint

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

TFBGA208 footprint

880 Views
timbarry
Contributor II

I'm creating a PCB design using LPC4088 in the TFBGA208 (SOT950-1) package. There is no recommended PCB footprint on the datasheet and there is conflicting information between NXP documents.


This document states that the PCB pads should be 0.475mm diameter, and the solder paste should be 0.425mm diameter:

https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/package-information/SOT950-1.pdf 

This document states that the PCB pads and solder paste should both be 0.35mm diameter:

https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN10778.pdf 

Which is correct?

Labels (1)
Tags (2)
0 Kudos
5 Replies

626 Views
timbarry
Contributor II

Hi Jeremy,


Thanks for your reply. If I use the pad sizes in the document you suggest, what via sizes and track and gap sizes should I use, as the ones in the application note (https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN10778.pdf) are not valid for those pad sizes?

Thanks
Tim

0 Kudos

626 Views
jeremyzhou
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Thanks for your reply.
It's appropriate to refer to the guide of 1.0 mm and 0.8 mm pitch BGA in the AN10778.
Have a great day,

TIC

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos

626 Views
timbarry
Contributor II

Hi Jeremy,

It is not possible to follow both SOT950-1 and AN10778. This is the reason for my original question. If I use the recommended pad size from https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/package-information/SOT950-1.pdf and the via and track size from AN10778, the via-to-pad spacing will be 0.0857mm, which less than the clearance specified in both documents, and is too small for most PCB manufacturers. So should I be using a smaller pad than specified in SOT950-1, or a smaller via than specified in AN10778?

Tim

0 Kudos

626 Views
jeremyzhou
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Tim Barry,

1) So should I be using a smaller pad than specified in SOT950-1, or a smaller via than specified in AN10778?

     You can consider to use a smaller pad than specified in SOT950-1.

Hope it helps.
Have a great day,
TIC

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos

626 Views
jeremyzhou
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
Thank you for your interest in NXP Semiconductor products and 
the opportunity to serve you.
Please referring to the this document.
Hope this is clear.
Have a great day,
TIC

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos