I've looked around and here's the impression I got: it seems to me that while certain barriers to accessibility of modern microcontrollers have been removed (low-cost development boards! free compilers for popular devices!), other barriers remained, a relic of the times past.
Here's a great company that can launch 500 new microcontroller devices and obviously cares about them landing in the hands of as many designers as possible (hence the Freedom boards), but cannot also manufacture a simple and inexpensive SWD programmer/debugger?
So many people are directed to seek a third-party device. Those third parties are tiny companies, their products are not easily procured in all parts of the world, and for small-scale usage they are way overpriced. There is uncertainty in which one to choose and whether it will work at all.
The alternative is to modify (destroy) a Freedom board to produce an unsupported solution that might kind-of work.
I appreciate your answer, Erich (and I *really* appreciate all the material you put on the web, it's a great resource!), but I think Freescale deserves some criticism for staying behind the times.
Why can't we have a Freedom JTAG/SWD device alongside the 500 Kinetis devices and all the Freedom boards?
Yes, I know that's "how it's done". But times change and as microcontrollers become more accessible, companies like P&E can't hope to continue to sell a device that costs $5 to manufacture for EUR 210 +VAT (that's what Farnell want's to charge me for P&E Multilink Universal!). There is still lots of business in the professional devices, but the hobbyist/amateur/beginner end should be taken care of with a device costing $20.
Texas Instruments got this right with the MSP430 Launchpad boards. All you need to do is remove a bunch of jumpers and you have a programmer for all their SBW-compatible devices (all the newer MSP430 chips). It is simple, it is cheap, and it works very well indeed. And it means that I can immediately design boards using MSP430 devices, without taking the cost and uncertainty of a JTAG FET tool into account.