I am using the RT1020 evaluation board and I am trying to get an SD Card to mount using the following example code from the sdcard_fatfs_freertos SDK demo :
if (f_mount(&g_fileSystem, driverNumberBuffer, 1U))
{
PRINTF("Mount volume failed.\r\n");
return kStatus_Fail;
}
If g_fileSystem resides in BOARD_SDRAM, the f_mount fails but if it is in SRAM_DTC, the function works.
Delving into the f_mount code, it calls find_volume, which calls check_fs which ends up reading sector 0 of the SD card using a call to disk_read(fs->pdrv, fs->win, sector, 1).
It would appear that reading a disc sector to a buffer (part of the g_fileSystem structure) which is in BOARD_SDRAM fails but if the buffer is in SRAM_DTC, it works. Some of the sector is read to BOARD_SDRAM but not the full 512 bytes. I don't know the technical reason for the failure but probably a timing issue due to the slower BOARD_SDRAM.
Does anyone have any ideas for solving this problem ?
Thanks,
Jon
已解决! 转到解答。
Hi Jon Welch
After further testing, I find it should disable D-cache in addition above two modifications, after that the sdcard_fatfs_freertos can work now, however, its performance obvious is lower than the original version.
To disable the D-cache feature, just comment out the SCB_EnableDCache() function in the BOARD_ConfigMPU(void) function, as the below shows.
/* Enable I cache and D cache */
//SCB_EnableDCache();
SCB_EnableICache();
Have a great day,
TIC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
Also for me disable D-cache works for me also, but I don't understand why.
Could you please explain more where the isssue comes from?
I'm also using SDRAM and SD card together.
Hi Jon Welch
Thank you for your interest in NXP Semiconductor products and
for the opportunity to serve you.
I think I need more information about the phenomenon, whether you can introduce what modification you did about the sdcard_fatfs_freertos demo, then I can replicate this phenomenon on my site and it can help me to figure it out.
Looking forward to your reply.
Have a great day,
TIC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi and thanks for your reply.
I can replicate the 'mount failed' error at will but the root cause is now a different failure to what I was originally seeing.
What I did was import the sdcard_fatfs_freertos demo app. On the second tab of the import option, I moved the BOARD_SDRAM option to next to top. I also added two build options to initialise the SDRAM. There were XIP_BOOT_HEADER_DCD_ENABLE=1 and SKIP_SYSCLK_INIT. Finally, I changed line 273 of sdcard_fatfs_freertos.c to read if (f_mount(&g_fileSystem, driverNumberBuffer, 1U)), ie change the option flag to 1 at the end to force the mount straight away rather than delay it.
When I built and ran the demo under the debugger, I got the mount failed error. If I moved the BOARD_SDRAM memory option back to its original place near the bottom, it ran correctly. With the SDRAM setup, the error was in the SD_SelectBusTiming routine in fsl_sd.c. However, with my original test, this function worked and I got a further error in the disc read function as per my original message. I haven't checked this out yet but will if necessary.
The original problem came to light when I added the sdcard_fatfs_freertos code to my existing app. I am using a lot of RAM for an OPC UA Server so had to use SDRAM and not SRAM_DTC. I have got around the problem temporarily by changing the declaration of g_filesystem from static FATFS g_fileSystem; to FATFS *g_fileSystem = (FATFS *) 0x20000000; to force it to use SRAM_DTC memory. This is not ideal but works until I can work out why the SDRAM option fails.
Any further advice would be appreciated, thanks.
Hi Jon Welch
After further testing, I find it should disable D-cache in addition above two modifications, after that the sdcard_fatfs_freertos can work now, however, its performance obvious is lower than the original version.
To disable the D-cache feature, just comment out the SCB_EnableDCache() function in the BOARD_ConfigMPU(void) function, as the below shows.
/* Enable I cache and D cache */
//SCB_EnableDCache();
SCB_EnableICache();
Have a great day,
TIC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
Many thanks for your prompt reply. Your suggestion to disable the DCache has solved my problem and I can now read/write to my SDCARD using BOARD_SDRAM.
Thanks again, very much appreciated.
Jon
Hi Jon Welch
Thanks for your reply.
I'd like to show the testing I did.
1) Enable DCD: adding XIP_BOOT_HEADER_DCD_ENABLE=1 and SKIP_SYSCLK_INI macros, in further, move up the BOARD_SDRAM and NCACHE_REGION, as below shows.
2) Place the g_fileSystem and g_fileSystem in the DTCM area.
__DATA(RAM3) static FATFS g_fileSystem; /* File system object */
__DATA(RAM3) static FIL g_fileObject; /* File object */
After doing the above work, I find that the demo will be stuck in the f_mkfs as below shows.
Now I'm still working on it.
Have a great day,
TIC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored
Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------