Hi everyone,
We are designing the circuit of i.MX8M Mini. If the peripherals in our design are all 3.3V interfaces, should the NVCC power pins (such as NVCC_JTAG/NVCC_NAND/NVCC_I2C/NVCC_GPIO1/NVCC_ECSPI/NVCC_SAI2) be connected to 3.3V?
Hi igor,
thank you reply again,
The following table lists the NVCC pins used in the reference design file. Some pins are connected to 1.8V, while others are connected to 3.3V. If our peripherals are all 3.3V interfaces. Do these pins whice connected to 1.8V need change to 3.3V?
Pin Number | PIN NAME | Voltage used in reference Design Files |
L19 | NVCC_JTAG | 1.8V |
U19 | NVCC_NAND | 3.3V |
W18 | NVCC_SAI1 | 3.3V |
V19 | NVCC_SAI2 | 1.8V |
Y10 | NVCC_SAI3 | 3.3V |
W17 | NVCC_SAI5 | 3.3V |
W12 | NVCC_GPIO1 | 1.8V |
J11 | NVCC_I2C | 1.8V |
J12 | NVCC_UART | 1.8V |
H10 | NVCC_ECSPI | 3.3V |
W22 | NVCC_ENET | 1.8V |
V20 | NVCC_SD1 | 1.8V |
V22 | NVCC_SD2 | 1.8V |
M19 | NVCC_CLK | 1.8V |
Hi liaochao
one needs to follow pad powering described in Table 85. i.MX 8M Dual / 8M QuadLite / 8M Quad 17 x 17 mm functional contact assignments, column "Power Group"
i.MX 8M Dual / 8M QuadLite / 8M Quad Applications Processors Data Sheet for Consumer Products
So first you should find which pad used in the case, then using that table find power "NVCC***" for it.
Best regards
igor