Hi,
i´m currently working with the SABRE board SDB from Freescale.
1) I prepared a SD-Card with 2GB for booting the Linux which comes as image, together with the MFG - Tool (kernel image, uBoot, and rootFS)
2) I prepared the internal eMMC which has a size of 8GB, with exactly the same images as used for the SD-Card
From my point of few, both, the SD Card and the eMMC are fomated in the same way (ext3).
For the eMMC 'df' gives me the following:
root@freescale /$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 7.3G 167.8M 6.7G 2% /
tmpfs 438.0M 68.0K 437.9M 0% /dev
shm 438.0M 0 438.0M 0% /dev/shm
rwfs 512.0K 512.0K 0 100% /mnt/rwfs
rwfs 512.0K 512.0K 0 100% /tmp
rwfs 512.0K 512.0K 0 100% /var
For the SD-Card 'df' gives me the following:
Filesystem | Size | Used Available Use% Mounted on | |
/dev/root | 1.8G | 57.8M | 1.7G 3% / |
tmpfs | 438.0M | 76.0K | 437.9M 0% /dev |
shm | 438.0M | 0 | 438.0M 0% /dev/shm |
rwfs | 512.0K | 512.0K | 0 100% /mnt/rwfs |
rwfs | 512.0K | 512.0K | 0 100% /tmp |
rwfs | 512.0K | 512.0K | 0 100% /var |
So, why are the used spaces different and why so big?
I expected the size of the rootFS should be something about 20MB.
I´m sure I am missing some fundamental items.
May be someone can shed up some light on my darkness.
Best regards
Karsten.
解決済! 解決策の投稿を見る。
I'm not very familiar with the MFG tool, but it sounds as if the block size chosen when creating the eMMC partition was different from the SD card partition.
Karsten, can you run "du -hs" on each to see if the content size is significantly different?
You might also read through the mksdcard.sh script to see if it's passing different options to mkfs.ext3.
It would be odd if that were the case, because the default 1k block size can support filesystems up to 2 TiB.
For the eMMC partition sizes, check the script which does partition, it is under the Profile folder, on the MFG - Tool.
Leo
HI Leo,
thx for the quick reply.
As far as I can see, both use the same script for partitioning.
Its only the device parameter which is different:
_________________________________________________________
<LIST name="SabreSD-eMMC" desc="Choose eMMC Linux as media">
sh mksdcard.sh /dev/mmcblk0
......
_________________________________________________________
<LIST name="Sabre-SD" desc="Choose SD as media">
sh mksdcard.sh /dev/mmcblk1
Best regards
Karsten
EricNelson are you available to help on this case?
I'm not very familiar with the MFG tool, but it sounds as if the block size chosen when creating the eMMC partition was different from the SD card partition.
Karsten, can you run "du -hs" on each to see if the content size is significantly different?
You might also read through the mksdcard.sh script to see if it's passing different options to mkfs.ext3.
It would be odd if that were the case, because the default 1k block size can support filesystems up to 2 TiB.