FLEXCAN fails to probe (i.mx6sx)

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

FLEXCAN fails to probe (i.mx6sx)

1,444 Views
kubiznak_petr
Contributor V

I'm having an issue with FLEXCAN on i.mx6sx. It fails to probe during Linux bootup (linux-fslc v4.1-2.0.x).

In dts, I just enable the peripheral:

 
&flexcan1 {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flexcan1_1>;
status = "okay";
};

...

pinctrl_flexcan1_1: flexcan1grp_1 {
fsl,pins = <
MX6SX_PAD_SD3_DATA5__CAN1_TX 0x1b0b0
MX6SX_PAD_SD3_DATA7__CAN1_RX 0x1b0b0
>;
};

 

Kernel boot log:

CAN device driver interface
2090000.can supply xceiver not found, using dummy regulator
flexcan 2090000.can: registering netdev failed
flexcan: probe of 2090000.can failed with error -110

 

After debugging the driver, I found register_flexcandev() enables the two clocks and calls flexcan_chip_disable() which timeouts.

I guess I'm missing some stupid little thing here. Does anybody have a suggestion what's wrong?

0 Kudos
Reply
4 Replies

1,426 Views
kubiznak_petr
Contributor V

<dummy>

0 Kudos
Reply

1,437 Views
igorpadykov
NXP Employee
NXP Employee
0 Kudos
Reply

1,424 Views
kubiznak_petr
Contributor V

Hi igor,

Thanks for your reply. I don't see any remarkable difference in the referenced dts file. I neither see anything remarkable in the u-boot - they only configure the pads, that shouldn't play any role, right?

I've cut the dts node to the minimum, i.e.:

&flexcan1 {
status = "okay";
};

Hence only enabling the node as defined in imx6sx.dtsi. Still does not work. The same behaviour for flexcan2.

Any idea why the FLEXCAN_MCR_LPM_ACK flag is not asserted?

Best Regards,
Petr

0 Kudos
Reply

1,415 Views
igorpadykov
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Petr

 

one can try to debug in probe() function using

AN4553 Using Open Source Debugging Tools for Linux on i.MX Processors
https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN4553.pdf

 

Best regards
igor

0 Kudos
Reply