Did workaround of EER009678 apply for MCIMX6Q-SDB ?

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Did workaround of EER009678 apply for MCIMX6Q-SDB ?

1,156 Views
ko-hey
Senior Contributor II

Hi all

Did workaround of EER009678 apply for MCIMX6Q-SDB ?

Considering the date of errata issue, I guess it haven't applied for the workaround.

Am I correct ?

Ko-hey 

Labels (2)
0 Kudos
Reply
3 Replies

1,025 Views
igorpadykov
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Ko-hey

erratum did not affect MCIMX6Q-SDB, as it affects boards designed in such way 

and using crystals which picks-up noise during crystal start up. In particular Chip Errata document

describes it as follows:

"If the noise contains frequency components higher than approximately 500 kHz"

In general this depends on board layout and design.

Best regards
igor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos
Reply

1,025 Views
MaxChou
Contributor III

Hello Igor

How to use scope to measure "the crystal has higher than 500khz noise on 32.768khz crystal"? 

"If the noise contains frequency components higher than approximately 500 kHz"

Sincerely

Max

0 Kudos
Reply

1,025 Views
ko-hey
Senior Contributor II

Hi Igor

Thank you for quick reply.

I understand.

Ko-hey

0 Kudos
Reply