So the LS1046ARDB eval board uses the 6V49205 clock driver for SDn_REFCLK1 clock output going to the LS1046 processor.
The 6V49205 specs the slew rate as:
But the LS1046A processor specifies it as:
So it looks like the clock buffer has a faster (5.7 vs 4) slew rate compared to what the LS1046 expects to see at its input.
Am I missing something?
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Results of simulating 6V49205 (IBIS model Fast-Strong) in HyperLynx:
1) PCIET/C_LR1 unconnected
Slew Rate at the 6V49205 die is 4.0 V/ns
2) PCIET/C_LR1 connected as in the LS1046ARDB schematics
Slew Rate at the LS1046A die is 2.2 V/ns
Results of simulating 6V49205 (IBIS model Fast-Strong) in HyperLynx:
1) PCIET/C_LR1 unconnected
Slew Rate at the 6V49205 die is 4.0 V/ns
2) PCIET/C_LR1 connected as in the LS1046ARDB schematics
Slew Rate at the LS1046A die is 2.2 V/ns