- Forums
- Product Forums
- General Purpose MicrocontrollersGeneral Purpose Microcontrollers
- i.MX Forumsi.MX Forums
- QorIQ Processing PlatformsQorIQ Processing Platforms
- Identification and SecurityIdentification and Security
- Power ManagementPower Management
- MCX Microcontrollers
- S32G
- S32K
- S32V
- MPC5xxx
- Other NXP Products
- Wireless Connectivity
- S12 / MagniV Microcontrollers
- Powertrain and Electrification Analog Drivers
- Sensors
- Vybrid Processors
- Digital Signal Controllers
- 8-bit Microcontrollers
- ColdFire/68K Microcontrollers and Processors
- PowerQUICC Processors
- OSBDM and TBDML
- S32M
-
- Solution Forums
- Software Forums
- MCUXpresso Software and ToolsMCUXpresso Software and Tools
- CodeWarriorCodeWarrior
- MQX Software SolutionsMQX Software Solutions
- Model-Based Design Toolbox (MBDT)Model-Based Design Toolbox (MBDT)
- FreeMASTER
- eIQ Machine Learning Software
- Embedded Software and Tools Clinic
- S32 SDK
- S32 Design Studio
- GUI Guider
- Zephyr Project
- Voice Technology
- Application Software Packs
- Secure Provisioning SDK (SPSDK)
- Processor Expert Software
- MCUXpresso Training Hub
-
- Topics
- Mobile Robotics - Drones and RoversMobile Robotics - Drones and Rovers
- NXP Training ContentNXP Training Content
- University ProgramsUniversity Programs
- Rapid IoT
- NXP Designs
- SafeAssure-Community
- OSS Security & Maintenance
- Using Our Community
-
- Cloud Lab Forums
-
- Knowledge Bases
- ARM Microcontrollers
- i.MX Processors
- Identification and Security
- Model-Based Design Toolbox (MBDT)
- QorIQ Processing Platforms
- S32 Automotive Processing Platform
- Wireless Connectivity
- CodeWarrior
- MCUXpresso Suite of Software and Tools
- MQX Software Solutions
-
- Home
- :
- Product Forums
- :
- Other NXP Products
- :
- Whart is the differences between TJA1051T/3/1J and TJA1051T/3/2Z
Whart is the differences between TJA1051T/3/1J and TJA1051T/3/2Z
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Whart is the differences between TJA1051T/3/1J and TJA1051T/3/2Z
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I know that 1 means dual source version and 2 means quad sourced version, so what do J and Z mean?My customer needs a document explaining the differences between TJA1051T/3/1J and TJA1051T/3/2Z. Can they replace it directly?
Is there such a document? If you could help me.thank you
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
The TJA1051T/3/1J and TJA1051T/3/2Z are both high-speed CAN transceivers from NXP. The differences between these two models are primarily related to their sourcing and packaging. The '1J' and '2Z' at the end of the product codes refer to the packaging type and the number of sources for the product.
The '1' in '1J' indicates that it is a dual source version, while the '2' in '2Z' indicates it is a quad source version. The 'J' and 'Z' refer to the packaging type. However, without specific details on what 'J' and 'Z' stand for in this context.
As for whether they can be replaced directly, it would depend on the specific requirements of your customer's application. While the core functionality of these transceivers is likely to be very similar, differences in sourcing and packaging could potentially have an impact on their suitability for certain applications.
Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
The differences between these two models are primarily related to their sourcing and packaging. The '1J' and '2Z' at the end of the product codes refer to the packaging type and the number of sources for the product.
The '1' in '1J' indicates that it is a dual source version, while the '2' in '2Z' indicates it is a quad source version. The 'J' and 'Z' refer to the packaging type. However, without specific details on what 'J' and 'Z' stand for in this context, it's difficult to provide a precise explanation. This is an assumption based on general knowledge of product coding.
As for whether they can be replaced directly, it would depend on the specific requirements of your customer's application. While the core functionality of these transceivers is likely to be very similar, differences in sourcing and packaging could potentially have an impact on their suitability for certain applications.
Regards
