Hello all,
I have a question concerning the USB virtual com example. In the following code:
usb_status_t USB_DeviceCdcVcomCallback(class_handle_t handle, uint32_t event, void *param)
{
usb_status_t error = kStatus_USB_Error;
uint32_t len;
uint8_t *uartBitmap;
usb_cdc_acm_info_t *acmInfo = &s_usbCdcAcmInfo;
usb_device_cdc_acm_request_param_struct_t *acmReqParam;
usb_device_endpoint_callback_message_struct_t *epCbParam;
acmReqParam = (usb_device_cdc_acm_request_param_struct_t *)param;
epCbParam = (usb_device_endpoint_callback_message_struct_t *)param;
switch (event)
{
case kUSB_DeviceCdcEventSendResponse:
{
if ((epCbParam->length != 0) && (!(epCbParam->length % g_UsbDeviceCdcVcomDicEndpoints[0].maxPacketSize)))
{
/* If the last packet is the size of endpoint, then send also zero-ended packet,
** meaning that we want to inform the host that we do not have any additional
** data, so it can flush the output.
*/
error = USB_DeviceCdcAcmSend(handle, USB_CDC_VCOM_BULK_IN_ENDPOINT, NULL, 0);
}
else if ((1 == s_cdcVcom.attach) && (1 == s_cdcVcom.startTransactions))
{
if ((epCbParam->buffer != NULL) || ((epCbParam->buffer == NULL) && (epCbParam->length == 0)))
{
/* User: add your own code for send complete event */
/* Schedule buffer for next receive event */
error = USB_DeviceCdcAcmRecv(handle, USB_CDC_VCOM_BULK_OUT_ENDPOINT, s_currRecvBuf,
g_UsbDeviceCdcVcomDicEndpoints[0].maxPacketSize);
#if defined(FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_KEEP_ALIVE_ENABLED) && (FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_KEEP_ALIVE_ENABLED > 0U) && \
defined(USB_DEVICE_CONFIG_KEEP_ALIVE_MODE) && (USB_DEVICE_CONFIG_KEEP_ALIVE_MODE > 0U) && \
defined(FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_USB_RAM) && (FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_USB_RAM > 0U)
s_waitForDataReceive = 1;
USB0->INTEN &= ~USB_INTEN_SOFTOKEN_MASK;
#endif
}
}
}
break;
case kUSB_DeviceCdcEventRecvResponse:
{
if ((1 == s_cdcVcom.attach) && (1 == s_cdcVcom.startTransactions))
{
s_recvSize = epCbParam->length;
#if defined(FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_KEEP_ALIVE_ENABLED) && (FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_KEEP_ALIVE_ENABLED > 0U) && \
defined(USB_DEVICE_CONFIG_KEEP_ALIVE_MODE) && (USB_DEVICE_CONFIG_KEEP_ALIVE_MODE > 0U) && \
defined(FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_USB_RAM) && (FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_USB_RAM > 0U)
s_waitForDataReceive = 0;
USB0->INTEN |= USB_INTEN_SOFTOKEN_MASK;
#endif
if (!s_recvSize)
{
/* Schedule buffer for next receive event */
error = USB_DeviceCdcAcmRecv(handle, USB_CDC_VCOM_BULK_OUT_ENDPOINT, s_currRecvBuf,
g_UsbDeviceCdcVcomDicEndpoints[0].maxPacketSize);
#if defined(FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_KEEP_ALIVE_ENABLED) && (FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_KEEP_ALIVE_ENABLED > 0U) && \
defined(USB_DEVICE_CONFIG_KEEP_ALIVE_MODE) && (USB_DEVICE_CONFIG_KEEP_ALIVE_MODE > 0U) && \
defined(FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_USB_RAM) && (FSL_FEATURE_USB_KHCI_USB_RAM > 0U)
s_waitForDataReceive = 1;
USB0->INTEN &= ~USB_INTEN_SOFTOKEN_MASK;
#endif
}
}
}
For cases kUSB_DeviceCdcEventSendResponse and kUSB_DeviceCdcEventRecvResponse, in the USB_DeviceCdcAcmRecv function call, endpoint index 0 is used to get max packet size (g_UsbDeviceCdcVcomDicEndpoints[0].maxPacketSize). However, this call reference BULK_OUT endpoint which is define at index 1 of g_UsbDeviceCdcVcomDicEndpoints variable:
/* Define endpoint for data class */
usb_device_endpoint_struct_t g_UsbDeviceCdcVcomDicEndpoints[USB_CDC_VCOM_ENDPOINT_DIC_COUNT] = {
{
USB_CDC_VCOM_BULK_IN_ENDPOINT | (USB_IN << 7U), USB_ENDPOINT_BULK, FS_CDC_VCOM_BULK_IN_PACKET_SIZE, 0U,
},
{
USB_CDC_VCOM_BULK_OUT_ENDPOINT | (USB_OUT << 7U), USB_ENDPOINT_BULK, FS_CDC_VCOM_BULK_OUT_PACKET_SIZE, 0U,
}};
Shouldn't it be index 1 (g_UsbDeviceCdcVcomDicEndpoints[1].maxPacketSize) passed in parameter to the function ? In this case it won't change anything as both max packet size for BULK_IN and BULK_OUT have the same value but I just want to clarify my understanding of USB stack.
Thanks
Hugio
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi Hugio,
I checked this and I agree with you. Even though there is no much consequence as this is an error scenario, the index should be 1. Thanks for pointing this out for us.
Have a great day,
Felipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored. Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Hugio,
I checked this and I agree with you. Even though there is no much consequence as this is an error scenario, the index should be 1. Thanks for pointing this out for us.
Have a great day,
Felipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!
- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored. Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------