Hi all,
I can observe a 10°C dispersion on temperature measured from the chip sensor on different iMX boards.
(on imx8mm yocto image, using cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp)
Here, under same conditions on 2 different chips (chipmin and chipmax):
Tchipmin=58°
Tchipmax=69°
I can also read my chips' TE1 and TE2 temperature values stored in fuses (from the 25°C and 85°C NXP measurement during manufacturing process) :
TE1chipmin=50° TE2chipmin=112°
TE1chipmax=61° TE2chipmax=120°
They follow the same trend : some chips are cooler, some are hotter.
This feels to me like a sensor offset issue which (I hope) can be corrected by calibration.
I tried to follow the software calibration as explained in the RM 5.4.5 Temperature Sensor Error Correction Method. But I'm really lost and confused because of poor explanation and a lack of context :
- what are the conditions of TE1 (room temp) and TE2 (hot temp) measures ? What is CPU load, or power consumption, what is the kernel doing, which image is running ? and are the 2 measurements consistent (under same conditions) ?
- Can we simply apply a slope compensation on the sensor value in a different operating condition, as suggested ?
According to me the temperature error / difference between 2 chips is mainly due to 2 factors : different power consumption / heating (intrinsic, because the chip is physically different) and temp sensor precision. How can we isolate them ? Is it safe to consider it is only due to sensor calibration ?
- Let's try on my 2 chips, chipmin and chipmax samples :
TCALIBchipmin=(58-50)×(85-25)/(112-50)+25=32° ?
TCALIBchipmax=(69-61)×(85-25)/(120-61)+25=33° ?
What is TCALIB meaning ? OK now the values are closer but It's definitely not the chip temp !
- And by the way, what is this reference curve they are talking about ?
We need more context
Hi all,
Have you found any solutions?
I am experiencing a similar issue on two different devices with the same IMX8MM model running the same software.
Thanks in advance,
Lucien
Hello,
In which i.MX8 is present this situation because the MX8MM the presented scenario is ok, the MX8QX need SCFW porting please check:
Regards