This is the link to the errata:
Iain Galloway (Future) said:
There is an errata in the first silicon which prevents the graphics from VPU operating at 1080p at the original spec voltage.
The fix for this is to raise the supply voltage for this domain.
Freescale are intentionally running T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V).
"The main reason the board runs hot is because we are intentionally running our T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V). While we are switching to T2.1 silicon beginning with the next production run, the software patch that sets VCC = 1.35V will remain in the Linux build for the foreseeable future. That means that Quick Start boards with T2.1 silicon will continue to run hot.
The Linux team is aware that they need to take the patch out.
If people are really concerned about the board running hot, they can make a modification in the U-BOOT code that will make it run cooler, at the expense of exposing the T2.0 VPU bug a little more.
In U-Boot, they can type the following (similar to the instruction on making video output changes):
setenv bootcmd ‘i2c mw 0x48 0x2f 0x60; i2c mw 0x48 0x3c 0x62;run bootcmd_mmc’
saveenv
What this change does is make the very first two commands that U-BOOT issues at boot are commands to the PMIC (0x48) to write (mw) to the VCC voltage set register (0x2f) a new voltage value of 1.3V (0x60) and then to the PMIC Supply register (0x3c) a command to ramp (0x62) to the new voltage value. Then the boot sequence will continue with the normal rest of the sequence (run bootcmd_mmc).
Then the users can make their own judgment on whether the board is running hot because of the increased VCC supply rail.
While we are switching to T2.1 silicon
I've been told that the errata fix accouts for the increased temperature of the chip.
The QS boards that ship in May should have the new silicon on them.
- For the moment, I am more concerned with the processor that get
really hot after some minutes of operation.
Some users say that it is due to the R199 bug. I am not sure of
that. But, since I have not patched yet the R199 bug on my
board, I can not get fixed on that yet.
There is an errata in the first silicon which prevents the graphics from VPU operating at 1080p at the original spec voltage.
The fix for this is to raise the supply voltage for this domain.
Freescale are intentionally running T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V).
"The main reason the board runs hot is because we are intentionally running our T2.0 silicon at maximum core voltage. (VCC = 1.35V). While we are switching to T2.1 silicon beginning with the next production run, the software patch that sets VCC = 1.35V will remain in the Linux build for the foreseeable future. That means that Quick Start boards with T2.1 silicon will continue to run hot.
The Linux team is aware that they need to take the patch out.
If people are really concerned about the board running hot, they can make a modification in the U-BOOT code that will make it run cooler, at the expense of exposing the T2.0 VPU bug a little more.
In U-Boot, they can type the following (similar to the instruction on making video output changes):
setenv bootcmd ‘i2c mw 0x48 0x2f 0x60; i2c mw 0x48 0x3c 0x62;run bootcmd_mmc’
saveenv
What this change does is make the very first two commands that U-BOOT issues at boot are commands to the PMIC (0x48) to write (mw) to the VCC voltage set register (0x2f) a new voltage value of 1.3V (0x60) and then to the PMIC Supply register (0x3c) a command to ramp (0x62) to the new voltage value. Then the boot sequence will continue with the normal rest of the sequence (run bootcmd_mmc).
Then the users can make their own judgment on whether the board is running hot because of the increased VCC supply rail.
While we are switching to T2.1 silicon
I've been told that the errata fix accouts for the increased temperature of the chip.
The QS boards that ship in May should have the new silicon on them.
- For the moment, I am more concerned with the processor that get
really hot after some minutes of operation.
Some users say that it is due to the R199 bug. I am not sure of
that. But, since I have not patched yet the R199 bug on my
board, I can not get fixed on that yet.
SD Cards do come in different "speeds" or "speed grades"... does this account for the slowness you saw?
>
> I am not using the microsd for a file system. It is too slow for
> me to stand. I wonder if this is normal... A USB harddrive is better
> and SATA is working better still.
>
Interesting, I have not noticed this SD Card slowness.
Not exactly, but I found lucid_1108.tar.gz on the Freescale website
http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=IMX5...
and tried that. Click on UBUNTU_RFS_DEMOIMG_1101. The video acceleration did not work at all so I went back to 10.04. If you want to try that "ER_1103" file, and have access to a Linux machine, you can gunzip rootfs.ext2.gz and then mount it with the loop device. From there you can copy the files or make your own tarball.
mkdir somedir
sudo mount -o loop rootfs.ext2 somedir
I am not using the microsd for a file system. It is too slow for me to stand. I wonder if this is normal... A USB harddrive is better and SATA is working better still.