Any ideas why PPP w/ 3G modem would work in one Yocto image and not another?

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

Any ideas why PPP w/ 3G modem would work in one Yocto image and not another?

1,215件の閲覧回数
patrickphilp
Contributor II

We've got a custom i.MX6 platform that we've designed, and we're adding 3rd party PCIe 3G modem cards to the boards.

When I build a Yocto image with the fsl-image-gui recipe (with ppp added), the PPP link will start up but shortly after authenticating, the link will drop with the following debug messages from PPP:

sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x1 magic=0x9950d399]

sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns1 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns2 0.0.0.0>]

rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x1 magic=0x96a24aa4]

rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x4]

LCP terminated by peer

sent [LCP TermAck id=0x4]

Modem hangup

Connection terminated.

However, the exact same hardware, using an image produced with the core-image-full-cmdline recipe works just fine - the PPP link is established and works without problems.

The PPP option and chatscript files are identical, and the Linux kernel is built with the exact same configuration.

Any suggestions on where to look in the various image recipes would be greatly appreciated.

pjp

ラベル(3)
0 件の賞賛
返信
2 返答(返信)

810件の閲覧回数
igorpadykov
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi Patrick

graphic rich gui and especially video may consume great

bus bandwidth, not leaving sufficient room for normal modem

operation, causing link timeouts.

Best regards

igor

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 件の賞賛
返信

810件の閲覧回数
patrickphilp
Contributor II

Actually, it turns out that connman was terminating the connection shortly after it was made. When connman was disabled and unable to kill the ppp connection, it works fine.

0 件の賞賛
返信