NXQ1TXH5 configuration for Tx coil Wurth 760308101103

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

NXQ1TXH5 configuration for Tx coil Wurth 760308101103

1,396 Views
cramirez
Contributor I

Hello all,

we have developed our wireless charger based on NXQ1TXH5 following AN11775 and it works perfectly with coil WT-505090-10K2-A11-G (TDK) and R8 47K. Indeed, I have tested it with several mobiles and works properly.

I would like considerate Tx coil Wurth 760308101103, but after replacing the coil and changing R8 to 82K, it doesn't work. For some second it tries to init the procces but finally it marks fault. I have tried disconnect SPR, SPL, FOD_E and FOD_T, but no results. Is any additional change necessary? Is Wurth 760308101103 compatible for charging standard mobiles?

The schematic is the same than application note one.

Thanks in advance.

0 Kudos
Reply
5 Replies

1,243 Views
cramirez
Contributor I

Unbelievable! If the receiver and transmiter coils are separated around 3-5mm, it works perfect! The only explanation that I can find is that when coils are without separation the communication is not possible due to saturation of signal. I suppose that the shape of the ferrite Wurth 760308101103 concentrates the magnetic flux too much. Do you agree?

Thanks!

0 Kudos
Reply

1,243 Views
cramirez
Contributor I

Hello Sun,

I have checked the values of R8/R9 (82K/47K) and I have even tried more permissive configuration like 100K/100K and finally no results, it tries to connect for some seconds (comsuption around 50-100mA) and after that it enters in fault state.

R13/R14 = 1.8K/27K are supposed OK.

Thx!

0 Kudos
Reply

1,243 Views
cramirez
Contributor I
0 Kudos
Reply

1,243 Views
guoweisun
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi

I attached the FOD configure file for your reference,please calculate the R8/R9 to try!

0 Kudos
Reply

1,243 Views
guoweisun
NXP TechSupport
NXP TechSupport

Hi

Could you please show these two coil datasheet?

This coil also need follow the spec of Qi.

0 Kudos
Reply