Keil vs IAR

取消
显示结果 
显示  仅  | 搜索替代 
您的意思是: 
已解决

Keil vs IAR

跳至解决方案
1,712 次查看
Cdn_aye
Senior Contributor I

I was hoping that someone could share their opinion on the Keil vs IAR toolchain using MQX. We want to change from CW to a more stable IDE and compiler, but retain the FSL MQX system. I have seen in the past that there are users on this forum using IAR and Keil. The price between the two seems close, if we retain the MQX middleware.

Thanks

Robert

标记 (5)
1 解答
662 次查看
BielikM
Contributor III

Hi,

There are couple of advantages of IAR. So far:

- Full featured task-aware debugging (Keil only has simple MQX viewer)

- Support for CortexM and CortexA, support for multi-core debugging (Vybrid)


Regards,

Martin

在原帖中查看解决方案

1 回复
663 次查看
BielikM
Contributor III

Hi,

There are couple of advantages of IAR. So far:

- Full featured task-aware debugging (Keil only has simple MQX viewer)

- Support for CortexM and CortexA, support for multi-core debugging (Vybrid)


Regards,

Martin