Referring to iMXRT1060 Reference manual CCM Clock Tree...
The diagram shows a divide-by-3 function that supposedly is in the CBCDR register.
It refers to CBCDR[AXI_PODF] field, but the description of the CBCDR register doesn't have any AXI_PODF field. Does this divide-by-3 block exist? If so what register is it controlled in?
Ed
解決済! 解決策の投稿を見る。
Ed
This is how it looks in the 1021 user's manual:
And in the Clock Root Generator section
Compared with the 1052/1062/1064 diagram:
As can be seen both feed AXI_CLK_ROOT, AKA SEMC_CLK_ROOT but for some reason the 1052/1062/1064 version has the register mask names set to axi rather than semc.
All occurrences of AXI_ in the CBCDR register should therefore be SEMC_ (so yes, replacing AXI_PODF with SEMC_PODF is the solution).
Regards
Mark
Hi Ed
I am pretty sure that the 105x..106x user's manuals mix up the names in this register, whereas the 1021 has of correctly.
The AXI_CLK_ROOT is "also" called SEMC_CLK_ROOT and there are three fields in that register that control this path. In the clock root generator they are referred to as
axi_alt_clk_sel, axi_clk_sel and axi_podf
but in the register description the are named
SEMC_ALT_CLK_SEL, SEMC_CLK_SEL and SEMC_PODF
I have used these on 1021, 1052, 1062 and 1064 to control the path and also SDK examples use these names in their header files.
Therefore I think the diagrams in the 1050 and 106x user's manuals are a bit at fault since they use the AXI name instead of the SEMC name, which then doesn't correctly match with the actual register field names.
Regards
Mark
[uTasker project developer for Kinetis and i.MX RT]
Contact me by personal message or on the uTasker web site to discuss professional training, solutions to problems or product development requirements
Thanks Mark,
Just to be clear, in the case of the 1062's clock tree diagram, when looking at the clock tree..
AXI_PODF should be replaced with SEMC_PODF.
Correct?
Ed
This is how it looks in the 1021 user's manual:
And in the Clock Root Generator section
Compared with the 1052/1062/1064 diagram:
As can be seen both feed AXI_CLK_ROOT, AKA SEMC_CLK_ROOT but for some reason the 1052/1062/1064 version has the register mask names set to axi rather than semc.
All occurrences of AXI_ in the CBCDR register should therefore be SEMC_ (so yes, replacing AXI_PODF with SEMC_PODF is the solution).
Regards
Mark