Dear Sir or Madam,
Hello.
Refer to Table 3-5. Total signal etch (DDR3) in Hardware Development Guide for i.MX6DQ6SDL, Rev. 1.
There is description of DRAM_SDCLK0 : 2120.044[Mils].
My customer measured the DRAM_SDCLK0 length on i.MX6Q SABRE-AI.
Actually the DRAM_SDCLK0 length looked 1849.483[Mils].
Refer to attached file: "DDR3_SDCLK_Length.xlsx"
[Question]
Should we think including the branch wiring about each signal length?
Or, can we ignore the branch wiring length?
BR,
Keita
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi Keita,
No, you have not to include the length of the wire branches you've shown into the total trace length calculation from the processor to the DDR3 chip.
Best Regards,
Artur
Yes, the trace length within a via should be taken into the account when calculating total trace length. However, only the actual trace length should be taken into the account, not always a total board thickness. For example, if a trace goes from Layer 2 to Layer 6 through a via on 8-layer board, only the distance between Layer 2 and Layer 6 should be taken into the account, not total board thickness.
Have a great day,
Artur
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Keita,
No, you have not to include the length of the wire branches you've shown into the total trace length calculation from the processor to the DDR3 chip.
Best Regards,
Artur
Hi Artur,
Thank you for your reply.
OK. I got it!
BR,
Keita