About residual voltage of power supply shut down to power on.

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

About residual voltage of power supply shut down to power on.

Jump to solution
1,765 Views
takashitakahash
Contributor III

At the timing of the interruption power-off to power-on, there when the voltage of the part of the power supply does not fall, There is some problem?

Please refer attachment Fig.

The specification VDD_SNVS_IN after the other power supply on.

As shown in attachment Figure widened voltage of 1.8 v and 3.3 v systems in the VDD_SNVS_IN injection timing.

Is this problem?

How voltage down of 1.8v and 3.3v ?

Also Is there such threshold of spec?


Labels (1)
0 Kudos
Reply
1 Solution
1,528 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

The residual voltage, strictly speaking, can violate recommended power up
sequence ; in particular - the restriction that GPIO pins must not be under
external voltages. So, please do not use relatively quick power off / on sequence 
to prevent effect of residual voltage on capacitors.

As for the case, shown on the "Power_on_timing" figure, we can see a violation, since
VDD_SNVS_IN supply must be turned on before any other power supply, assuming
other power suppliers start their rising from zero voltage. 


Have a great day,
Yuri

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
Reply
3 Replies
1,529 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

The residual voltage, strictly speaking, can violate recommended power up
sequence ; in particular - the restriction that GPIO pins must not be under
external voltages. So, please do not use relatively quick power off / on sequence 
to prevent effect of residual voltage on capacitors.

As for the case, shown on the "Power_on_timing" figure, we can see a violation, since
VDD_SNVS_IN supply must be turned on before any other power supply, assuming
other power suppliers start their rising from zero voltage. 


Have a great day,
Yuri

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Kudos
Reply
1,528 Views
takashitakahash
Contributor III

Hi ,

Yuri

Thank you for your replay.

Add the discharge resistors, as far as possible until the 0 V power down protection.

But remains of 100 mV  of 3.3 V for GPIO.

We anticipate no problems voltage is actually the concern you have??

Would you Please also check .

0 Kudos
Reply
1,528 Views
Yuri
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

  The i.MX6 specs do not require voltage rising from 0.0 V, in this sense the 100 mV
does not look as a violation. But to be fully on safe side it may be recommended
to apply an external POR signal (to avoid using internal one, based of voltage ramp) 

~Yuri.