Applicability - Safe processing Safety Function in Safety Manual Addendum

キャンセル
次の結果を表示 
表示  限定  | 次の代わりに検索 
もしかして: 

Applicability - Safe processing Safety Function in Safety Manual Addendum

ソリューションへジャンプ
486件の閲覧回数
FabioG
Contributor III

Hi there, 

In safety manual's Addendum, in Tab "Module classification" there is a column named: 

"Applicability - Safe processing Safety Function". 

The legend says: "x Identifies the safety function in which the SR element is used...."

1)I didn't find in manual any definition of Safety Function: could you explain?

2) what is the difference beetween SF and Safety Mechanisms ?

3)  shall I implement any software for safety functions in which a particular module (SafetyRelevant) is used?

4) for example: in category "Reset and Boot", modules DCM and DCF are not safety mechanisms but they are Safety functions-related. The question are:

 a) shall I implement any software?

b) if yes, what kind of funcionality ?

c) is that funtionality present in safety manual or in other NXP documentation?

Best Regards

Fabio

タグ(1)
0 件の賞賛
返信
1 解決策
351件の閲覧回数
antoinedubois
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello Fabio, sorry for the delay.

1) Safety Function is a function that if a failure happens and without safety feature would violate the safety goal. it is usually for Microcontroller a subfunction of the "Safe compute function" for each we derive our safety concept.

2) SF Safety functions failure directly violate the safety goals. A SF is considered a potential SPF. SM are the HW diagnostic that detects failure, they usually contributiing to the Latent fault metrics.

3) The SF is what you consider Safe and that you need to protect. It should include your Safety related SW that is implemented within the "Sae Compute function).

4) If DCM or DCF fails we have analyzed tthat it could violtate the safety goals. You can look in the FMEDA and review what Safety mechanisms we consider to detect/prevent the failures. If anything needs to be implemented it would then be explained in the Assumptions of Use. SO you mostly need to implement the assumptions of use for DCM and DCF.

 

I hope it helps.

Antoine Dubois

元の投稿で解決策を見る

0 件の賞賛
返信
1 返信
352件の閲覧回数
antoinedubois
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hello Fabio, sorry for the delay.

1) Safety Function is a function that if a failure happens and without safety feature would violate the safety goal. it is usually for Microcontroller a subfunction of the "Safe compute function" for each we derive our safety concept.

2) SF Safety functions failure directly violate the safety goals. A SF is considered a potential SPF. SM are the HW diagnostic that detects failure, they usually contributiing to the Latent fault metrics.

3) The SF is what you consider Safe and that you need to protect. It should include your Safety related SW that is implemented within the "Sae Compute function).

4) If DCM or DCF fails we have analyzed tthat it could violtate the safety goals. You can look in the FMEDA and review what Safety mechanisms we consider to detect/prevent the failures. If anything needs to be implemented it would then be explained in the Assumptions of Use. SO you mostly need to implement the assumptions of use for DCM and DCF.

 

I hope it helps.

Antoine Dubois

0 件の賞賛
返信